John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
[...]
Quoted message said:So what exactly about Bill
You asked Charles, but I'll chime in. You'd expect that, right?
Is Bill even the person's name? Rhetorical. I mean, who cares? I don't
especially. I take him with a grain of salt. Hmm. I'm watching my
blood pressure, so perhaps I should reword that.
Quoted message said:do you appreciate
Certainly his doggedness. Persistence like The Broken Record's is a
rare commodity.
Also there's an amount of creativity there as well. Most of TBR's
comments are lightyears beyond your "Loser!" anthem.
Quoted message said:besides his dislike for JMW?
And that appeal can't be denied. ;o)
[...]
Quoted message said:Look at the people you have sucked up to
If /sucked up to/ is defined as *agreeing with someone* then you have
sucked up to JMW more than once.
Quoted message said:over the years. <snip>, Curt, <snip>, etc. They're all scum
Scum.
If you're bright (maybe) and a basic researcher you'll see (again,
maybe) the connection between that word and your perspective. Wrt JMW,
I suspect you see a jewel where this is only a turd.
Quoted message said:and a person is judged by the company he keeps
And here you find yourself conversing with so-called gutter trash. Who
will judge you?
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/