Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: testosterone testing (NY Times)

Started by CowPunk · · Last activity · 3 posts · 321 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 July 2006
Last activity
29 July 2006
Original author
CowPunk
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
321
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. yirg said:

    I haven't seen this posted here yet. Maybe I missed it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/28/sports/othersports/28doping.html

    July 28, 2006
    Testing Benefits and Levels of Testosterone Is Difficult
    By GINA KOLATA

    "When we get cases to review, the chain of custody is really
    paramount," he said. "If it gets out of sight for two seconds,
    someone can squirt testosterone into it. And there are people like that
    who would like to see an American, the winner of the Tour de France,
    disgraced. That's why the chain of custody has to be codified."

    And that is why the urine samples are divided in two, the A sample and
    the B sample.

    Imagine that!
    The labs aren't perfect? oh my!

    The real remedy to the situation is to have multiple labs testing each
    sample.
    3 labs test the A sample and 3 labs test the B sample.

    I guarantee each lab will give different results/levels of drugs even
    though they
    test the same sample.

    BTW,
    How many people in here have ever tried to pipette 0.001ml of a liquid?
    1ml = 1cm cubed

  2. CowPunk said:
    yirg said:

    I haven't seen this posted here yet. Maybe I missed it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/28/sports/othersports/28doping.html

    July 28, 2006
    Testing Benefits and Levels of Testosterone Is Difficult
    By GINA KOLATA

    "When we get cases to review, the chain of custody is really
    paramount," he said. "If it gets out of sight for two seconds,
    someone can squirt testosterone into it. And there are people like that
    who would like to see an American, the winner of the Tour de France,
    disgraced. That's why the chain of custody has to be codified."

    And that is why the urine samples are divided in two, the A sample and
    the B sample.

    Imagine that!
    The labs aren't perfect? oh my!

    The real remedy to the situation is to have multiple labs testing each
    sample.
    3 labs test the A sample and 3 labs test the B sample.

    I guarantee each lab will give different results/levels of drugs even
    though they
    test the same sample.

    BTW,
    How many people in here have ever tried to pipette 0.001ml of a liquid?
    1ml = 1cm cubed

    I think I probably did in my chem major days, but I've totally blocked
    it out.

    Steve

  3. CowPunk says...

    Quoted message said:

    Imagine that!
    The labs aren't perfect? oh my!

    The real remedy to the situation is to have multiple labs testing each
    sample.
    3 labs test the A sample and 3 labs test the B sample.

    I guarantee each lab will give different results/levels of drugs even
    though they
    test the same sample.

    BTW,
    How many people in here have ever tried to pipette 0.001ml of a liquid?
    1ml = 1cm cubed

    Once upon a time I was responsible for calibrating 0.0005ml pipettes,
    among other things. Then I got to gather the manufacturer specs and any
    other research data I could get and argue with the QA director exactly
    what constituted a passing result.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.