H
Howard Kveck
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
RonSonic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hopefully, LNDD, WADA and UCI will read the majority decision as something
> other than vindication. I see it as a screaming, in their face wake up call
> to promulgate stringent technical, administrative and ethical standards and
> meet them. I would expect that another such trainwreck would completely destroy
> the presumptions of competence and good faith that very narrowly decided this
> case.
Well, I really have to believe that those organizations will see the decision as a
vindication. After all, at least one of them has already essentially stated that it's
infallible. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to spend much, if any, time
re-examining the way things happened and their part in the process. It reminds me of
those cases where a prosecutor has gotten a conviction and when evidence strongly
suggests that conviction is in error, refuses to reopen the case - he's happy with a
conviction and doesn't really care if it's a *just* conviction. Nifong bastards...
--
tanx,
Howard
Faberge eggs are elegant but I prefer Faberge bacon.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
RonSonic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hopefully, LNDD, WADA and UCI will read the majority decision as something
> other than vindication. I see it as a screaming, in their face wake up call
> to promulgate stringent technical, administrative and ethical standards and
> meet them. I would expect that another such trainwreck would completely destroy
> the presumptions of competence and good faith that very narrowly decided this
> case.
Well, I really have to believe that those organizations will see the decision as a
vindication. After all, at least one of them has already essentially stated that it's
infallible. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to spend much, if any, time
re-examining the way things happened and their part in the process. It reminds me of
those cases where a prosecutor has gotten a conviction and when evidence strongly
suggests that conviction is in error, refuses to reopen the case - he's happy with a
conviction and doesn't really care if it's a *just* conviction. Nifong bastards...
--
tanx,
Howard
Faberge eggs are elegant but I prefer Faberge bacon.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
