Yes, we talked about it already. Magnesium lower castings might not hold up to the tension forces incurred by placing the caliper in front of the leg.
Which of course is [censored]. Fatigue is something you can design for and eliminate. User error *must* be designed for because it cannot be eliminated.
Yes, we talked about it already. Magnesium lower castings might not hold up to the tension forces incurred by placing the caliper in front of the leg.
Which of course is [censored]. Fatigue is something you can design for and eliminate.
damned right - you put the caliper behind the fork!!!
Quoted message said:
User error *must* be designed for because it cannot be eliminated.
true. just like steering over-ride mechanism that stops me crashing into trees? or maybe you mean the ankle chain that stops me leaving my sofa because the minute i jump on my bike, i'm exposed to all kinds of danger my sofa does just not offer? i mean, that's /real/ risk elimination.
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:12:14 -0400, "Phil, Squid-in-Training" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Yes, we talked about it already. Magnesium lower castings might not hold up >to the tension forces incurred by placing the caliper in front of the leg.
Which of course is [censored]. Fatigue is something you can design for and eliminate.
damned right - you put the caliper behind the fork!!!
:-) Right! That's EXACTLY why all front cantilever studs face backward! Right, Jim?
After all, we _know_ nobody can safely design members in tension! ;-)
- Frank Krygowski
what kind of engineering professor are you frank? it's incredible to me that someone that dare to teach this otherwise exacting discipline has the balls to deliberately ignore application data that is so public and so commonly used in critical systems design. are you for real?