ok, so that idiocy has been rolling on for nearly 3 weeks now, and still we have:
1. annan's theory which calculates supposed ejection force
Are you going to share your own estimate? You'll obviously want to take account of the 235 foot-pounds of torque that Cannondale measured (with a medium-sized rider riding round a car park):
ok, so that idiocy has been rolling on for nearly 3 weeks now, and still we have:
1. annan's theory which calculates supposed ejection force
Are you going to share your own estimate? You'll obviously want to take account of the 235 foot-pounds of torque that Cannondale measured (with a medium-sized rider riding round a car park):
Welcome to usenet. In your second and subsequent posts, I hope you will learn to separate the quoted text from your own original contribution by indenting to different levels.
ok, so that idiocy has been rolling on for nearly 3 weeks now, and still we have:
1. annan's theory which calculates supposed ejection force
Are you going to share your own estimate? You'll obviously want to take account of the 235 foot-pounds of torque that Cannondale measured (with a medium-sized rider riding round a car park):
I'm really surprised why you seem to keep trying to beat yourself up over this. You guessed wrong, the world passed you by. Better luck next time eh?
James
james, i already did the math for you, but somehow, incredibly, you will still not address it. if you were to, you may suddenly find some credibility and get some traction with your crusade, whatever the heck the objective of that may be. an axle will not eject if the pullout force exceeds ejection force. [ignoring lawyer lips of course.] end of message from planet earth.
