In article <[email hidden]>, Retro Bob
Quoted message said:Kerry's problem was that he had a long _liberal_ record to attack.
The fact that the Democrats were foolish enough to run a Northern
liberal speaks volumes about how ignorant they are. The fact that he
didn't get buried like George McGovern reflects what a major
loser Bush is.
That a long liberal record was "attackable" with the results we got should be a
tap on the shoulder.
President Bush has a messy situation in Iraq that is being held up before the
American voters, his win means just the opposite of "looser" status in more
ways than one.
Quoted message said:That's a boost for the Dem's in 2008 because aside from cyclical
improvements in the economy, Bush will be as bad over the next
four years as he was over the last four so the dislike factor will be
just as high. The bad news for the Dem's is that they will still
be ignorant enough to nominate Hillary.
If the economy continues to recover from the impact of 9-11-02 Hillary is
liable to get the same treatment as George McGovern.
Tom Gibb <[email hidden]>