Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Spoke Failure--surface quality or stress relief?

Started by Zog The Undeniable · · Last activity · 1 post · 452 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 April 2005
Last activity
9 April 2005
Original author
Zog The Undeniable
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
452
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bruce Graham said:

    I had one let go without any jam that I was aware of. I did notice that
    the rim had yielded around the socket a bit and the nipple did not want
    to line up exactly straight with the replacement spoke, so that may have
    added a cyclic bending force to the threaded end of the spoke.

    I should add that quite a few of the sockets had moved a bit in the rim,
    due to much loaded touring over rough roads of various types and probably
    a bit much spoke tension.

    All my other spoke failures have been at the bent end.

    You can get the same problem with too many crossings, especially with a
    large-flange hub.

    The usual 3x may be too much for a really big hub. If you look at the
    two spokes either side of the valve, these will generally be the width
    of the flange apart at the hub end when using 3x. With a s/f hub this
    is very similar to the distance between rim holes, so the "valve" spokes
    are parallel. With a l/f hub the spokes converge on the rim and aren't
    perpendicular.

    Normally the nipples can orient themselves in the rim to some extent
    (Sapim nipples have rounded heads to make this easier) but if they
    don't, the spoke has to bend.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.