Re: Soymilk

No we will not, because you rarely present science, and even when
repeating the gospel according to your nutritional theology, can't support
what you present and often don't understand. Assertions made up your
blurb as to why we have binocular vision and why we have the teeth and
digestion system we have, and it was wrong on all counts. There is no
person recognized in the area of human evolution that will substanuate
your notions that you cribbed from some "meat is great and veggie alone is
not" web sources, I know because I have looked at the same pages too. I
can also give you web pages from the "veggies are great and meat is not"
folk who use the same info to argue against the meat folk; and both are
wrong and spin the hell out of the info until it can't be recognized.
You and I are not in any way on an equal scientific footing either in
training or grasp of scientific info and understanding by which to do a
mutual acceptance of differing views.

Quoted message said:

We'll agree to disagree. Correcting your mis-interpretation of science
and other peoples discussions is not something I hanker to do on a
daily basis, which is exactly what I end up having to do anytime you
get in the discussion. Figure it out yourself.

TC

Quoted message said:

You had two broad points, our eye configuration and predation and our

Quoted message said:

physical makeup to digest meat as a primary food source based on

human

Quoted message said:

phenotypes. My remarks countered each of those. What part of your
message did I miss countering? To have been countered is not to have

been

Quoted message said:

misrepresented.

Quoted message said:

keep on misrepresenting what I say, that'll win your argument every
time.

TC

[email hidden] wrote:
> Oh dear, where to begin, so much [censored]. Little of the blow is

valid.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

To
> mention just one item, we have eyes in frount because we inherited

it

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

from
> our tree dwelling primate ancestores where travel mainly in trees
required
> good depth perception, or you might fall and break your neck in
pursuit of
> the fruits that made up the bulk of the diet. It is thought humans
first
> were scavengers, not predators, which came later in those areas

where

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

it
> could be sustained to any degree. Some real predators have eyes

in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

other
> configurations,ex. wolves. Our teeth and digestation system is in
the
> middle of true predators and herbavors. The latter are the grass
eaters
> like cows. We are not on the ends of the ranges, we are in the
middle
> between grass eaters and meat only eaters and our bodies reflect

that

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> fact. You have been reading too much of the info from the

meataphile

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> nutrition theology sources. The veggie alone folk have their
oppisite
> theology using the very same info and arguments but in reverse,

both

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

are
> wrong for the same reasons.
>
> >Absolute garbage. Physiologically we are carnivorous omnivores.
> >
> >We have cutting and tearing teeth similar to all predators as
opposed
> >to crushing teeth like cows.
> >
> >We have both eyes in front giving us excellent depth perception

for

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >hunting as opposed to grass eaters that have large eyes on the

side

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

of
> >their heads and excellent peripheral vision to see predators.
> >
> >Our GI tract is short like other predators and meat eaters as
opposed
> >to the long GI tracts and multiple stomachs.
> >
> >These are only a few of the many physiological traits that brand

us

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

as
> >a primarily carnivorous animal.
> >
> >TC