freightgod wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>
>> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
>> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
>>
>> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
>
> Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
>
**** for brains, it's all rock. As in no loose dirt.
Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> freightgod wrote:
> > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> >
> >> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
> >> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
> >>
> >> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
> >
> > Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
> >
>
> **** for brains, it's all rock. As in no loose dirt.
Dave's off his meds again.
Pay him as much attention as you would the demented doctor.
I should know better than to respond to someone who's ignorance shines
clearly but the line RAL tried to take was where the trail was supposed to
be. The skidiots have managed to route around the correct line on that
section (opting for a less challenging ride). The ledge (or what you think
you observe to be the "correct" line) doesn't show up in the photo. I know,
I took the photo.
GeeDubb wrote:
> "freightgod" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> >
> >> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
> >> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
> >>
> >> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
> >
> > Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
>
> I should know better than to respond to someone who's ignorance shines
> clearly but the line RAL tried to take was where the trail was supposed to
> be. The skidiots have managed to route around the correct line on that
> section (opting for a less challenging ride). The ledge (or what you think
> you observe to be the "correct" line) doesn't show up in the photo. I know,
> I took the photo.
>
> Gary
Cool. And thank you for actually explaining it in a decent manner.
Unlike the OP!
Ed Pirrero wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > freightgod wrote:
> > > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > >
> > >> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
> > >> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
> > >>
> > >> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
> > >
> > > Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
> > >
> >
> > **** for brains, it's all rock. As in no loose dirt.
>
> Dave's off his meds again.
>
> Pay him as much attention as you would the demented doctor.
>
> E.P.
freightgod wrote:
> GeeDubb wrote:
> > "freightgod" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > >
> > >> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
> > >> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
> > >>
> > >> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
> > >
> > > Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
> >
> > I should know better than to respond to someone who's ignorance shines
> > clearly but the line RAL tried to take was where the trail was supposed to
> > be. The skidiots have managed to route around the correct line on that
> > section (opting for a less challenging ride). The ledge (or what you think
> > you observe to be the "correct" line) doesn't show up in the photo. I know,
> > I took the photo.
> >
> > Gary
>
> Cool. And thank you for actually explaining it in a decent manner.
> Unlike the OP!
He treated exactly like you deserved to be treated.
freightgod wrote:
> Ed Pirrero wrote:
> > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > > freightgod wrote:
> > > > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
> > > >> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
> > > >
> > >
> > > **** for brains, it's all rock. As in no loose dirt.
> >
> > Dave's off his meds again.
> >
> > Pay him as much attention as you would the demented doctor.
> >
> > E.P.
>
> nice association. Eddie. Keep up the good work.
I thought so myself.
Two idiots that haven't a clue about riding or associating with polite
folks.
GeeDubb wrote:
> "frightpig" <frightpigis@yahoo> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> >
> >> What you don't see in the next picture was the harder line straight up.
> >> I tried an alternate but came unglued.
> >>
> >> http://www.schnauzers.ws/images/110306/IMG_4972.jpg
> >
> > Nothing like riding off trail bub!! Hope you fell off!
>
> I should know better than to respond to someone who's ignorance shines
> clearly but the line RAL tried to take was where the trail was supposed to
> be. The skidiots have managed to route around the correct line on that
> section (opting for a less challenging ride). The ledge (or what you think
> you observe to be the "correct" line) doesn't show up in the photo. I know,
> I took the photo.
>
> Gary
Key words at the beginning of this post,Gary. I could tell by the pic
that RAL was giving the original line a go, as could "99% of the people
who frequnt (sic) this little commune", with the obvious exception
being those who can't see beyond their trailer park's chain link fence.
Maybe colon and dave should just go hump each other now.
