Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly

I do believe you can be successfully taken to court again. --rb

"Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jan the Accuser said:

Time to shut up, Mark.

The readers are tired of it.

I'm just asking you to back up your vile accusation
against me.

You can't do it. You can't post the original
statement in which I used the word "delibrately".
If you did, everybody would be able to see that
the statement was NOT a lie. That's why you
won't post it.

It would be the same as admitting you were
wrong when you accused me of being a LIAR.

Quoted message said:

Not knowing when to shut up is how you landed in court.

You haven't learned a thing from that experience.

Back to my killfile.

Jan

Go ahead, pretend you're not reading any
of my postings. Use that as an excuse for not
posting the LIE you claim I told.

You know you can't back up your false
accusations.

You remind me of a person I once knew.
He said he couldn't imagine that God doesn't
exist. He said if God didn't exist, and there
were no Heaven and no Hell, he'd rob banks.
He'd murder people. There'd be no reason
not to.

I told him that I was glad he believed in God,
and I hoped he continued to do so.

Somehow, I'm thinking that Jan is in a somewhat
similar situation. She's realized that she's not
going to be among the Elect. She's going to
Hell, and there's nothing she can do about it.
So why not LIE? She's going to Hell anyway,
so why not violate a Commandment or two?

Jan the Accuser said:

Now, up comes the *original statement*

Which is just more mumbo jumbo.

All that is needed is the retraction.

Where is the ORIGINAL STATEMENT which is a LIE?

Surely you're not claiming the retraction itself is the LIE,
are you?

The retraction does not say I lied or made a false statement.
Even if it did, what is the ORIGINAL STATEMENT referred to
by the retraction that you claim is a LIE?

I'm asking you to post the ORIGINAL STATEMENT I made
which used the word "delibrately", that you claim is a LIE.

Why won't you do that, Jan?

You can't do it. You can't post the original
statement in which I used the word "delibrately".
If you did, everybody would be able to see that
the statement was NOT a LIE. That's why you
won't post it.

It would be the same as admitting you were
wrong when you accused me of being a LIAR.

It would be the same admitting that you are the
one here who is a LIAR.

Jan the Accuser said:

Plain and simple Mark Thorson is a liar many times over.

Jan

You have claimed that I lied about Cell Tech
or their algae in a sentence that used the word
"delibrately".

Where is the ORIGINAL STATEMENT which is a LIE?

Surely you're not claiming the retraction itself is the LIE,
are you?

The retraction does not say I lied or made a false statement.
Even if it did, what is the ORIGINAL STATEMENT referred to
by the retraction that you claim is a LIE?

I'm asking you to post the ORIGINAL STATEMENT I made
which used the word "delibrately", that you claim is a LIE.

Why won't you do that, Jan?

You can't do it. You can't post the original
statement in which I used the word "delibrately".
If you did, everybody would be able to see that
the statement was NOT a LIE. That's why you
won't post it.

It would be the same as admitting you were
wrong when you accused me of being a LIAR.

It would be the same admitting that you are the
one here who is a LIAR.