Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Re: quantifying design criteria

Started by Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic · · Last activity · 1 post · 561 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
17 September 2005
Last activity
17 September 2005
Original author
Sunset Lowracer [TM] Fanatic
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
561
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Edward Dolan was on topic when he said:

    ...
    The only thing I would add to Tom's excellent message on recumbent bike
    design is to be aware of high bottom brackets. Very many of us will get numb
    feet if the BB gets much above the seat....

    Back in the ancient past when I owned a 20/20 Wishbone RT [1] with a
    13-inch/33 cm seat height and 26-inch/66 cm bottom bracket height, I
    would suffer from foot pain unless I wore shoes with proper fit and
    very stiff soles (i.e. SiDi Dominator II Mega). The SiDi shoes also
    offered the advantage of being black, as a rider's feet will be in
    his/her vision on a bike with a high bottom bracket. Brightly colored
    shoes would be an annoying distraction.

    [1] See <http://www.ihpva.org/incoming/2001/wbone2.jpg>.
    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley

    "We are discussing whether humans as prey are 'natural'. Clearly,
    they are, or that mountain lion wouldn't have been trying to eat a
    human." - M.V.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.