General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: post induction stall

Started by Doug Freyburger · · Last activity · 1 post · 210 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 May 2006
Last activity
15 May 2006
Original author
Doug Freyburger
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
210
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > whoever told me about post induction "stall" was absolutely correct.

    The word's pause.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > starting: 172
    > > week1: 165
    > > week2: 162

    So at the end of Induction you'd lost 10 pounds. Since the ideal
    loss rate for keeping it off is 4 per month you're actually good for
    2 months. Not that any dieter in history would want that to
    happen.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > week3: 162
    > > week4: 162

    It is extremely common to lose nothing in week 3 and common
    to lose noting in week 4. It's the body evening out the unrealistic
    initial drop.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > menus:
    > >
    > > eggs, sausage, bacon, hamburger, ny strip steak, green beans, mixed
    > > veggies,
    > > salad, flounder, water, fruit springs water with splenda, decaf coffee
    > > with
    > > 1 packet splenda. no ketchup. plus, i walk 4 miles three times a week and
    > > weight train 2 times a week.
    > >
    > > i can't do more than this.

    You don't need to since nothing's wrong.

    Quoted message said:

    As for even 3 weeks being too long, Dr. Atkins defined a stall as 4
    weeks without loss of either weight or inchs without a change in
    excercise, eating habits, etc. I'm comfortable with that definition
    and see no need to start foolling around with what one is doing just
    because the scale hasn't moves for TWO weeks.

    IMO the reason for the definition is simple - what's realistic and what
    isn't. The water loss of Induction often gives newbies unrealistic
    expections. Folks don't get that water isn't fat so they think it's
    physically possible to lose fat at 3500-4000 calories per pound at the
    same rate as water at 0 calories per pound. The four week thing
    is specifically to teach what is realistic in the face of that.

    Check back if 162 at the end of week 6. That's when the disagreements
    will start in the advice on how to proceed. ;^)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.