UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Paul Smith

Started by Tom Crispin · · Last activity · 268 posts · 6,438 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 December 2007
Last activity
4 January 2008
Original author
Tom Crispin
Posts
268
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
6,438
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 268
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In uk.rec.cycling MrBitsy twisted the electrons to say:

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Clinch said:

    I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    they're bigger than me.


    He has said no such thing.

    In <[email hidden]> he (Brimstone) said :-

    Quoted message said:

    The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear.

    .... which seems to be saying exactly that thing.
    --
    These opinions might not even be mine ...
    Let alone connected with my employer ...

  2. Steve Firth said:

    Perhaps you simply wait until the lights change then move off? That's
    what I do on my bicycle.

    It's too late now, but perhaps before making yourself look stupid you
    should have considered the bit in brackets from Pete's example:

    Quoted message said:

    So let's say I'm at some lights, just behind the ASL and after I
    got there an HGV pulls up behind me. The lights change but I stay
    put a moment (maybe I'm turning right and the way isn't clear yet)
    and the truck rolls over me because the drver's on the 'phone and
    didn't look down... That's all my fault, I should have seen it
    coming and done something differently?

    --
    Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk>
    Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often
    "The plural of anecdote is not data" - Frank Kotsonis

  3. Peter Clinch said:
    Brimstone said:

    Why choose such a pathetic example?

    Pathetic in what sense? That it immediately demonstrates your
    "point" was an over-generalised sweeping assumption that's no help
    to anybody?

    Why choose such a pathetic, over-generalised sweeping assumption?


    Because not everyone needs everything explaining to them in minute detail
    with all the exclusions and caveats included as you seem to.

  4. Brimstone said:
    Peter Clinch said:

    Brimstone wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why choose such a pathetic example?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Pathetic in what sense? That it immediately demonstrates your
    "point" was an over-generalised sweeping assumption that's no help
    to anybody?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why choose such a pathetic, over-generalised sweeping assumption?

    Quoted message said:

    Because not everyone needs everything explaining to them in minute detail
    with all the exclusions and caveats included as you seem to.

    Brim...

    I'm going to save this post on my desktop.

  5. MrBitsy said:
    Peter Clinch said:
    MrBitsy said:

    Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them - fact
    of modern life.

    I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    they're bigger than me.

    He has said no such thing.

    "The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear" seems quite similar
    to "I shouldn't be close to lorries because they're bigger than me."

    Cheers,
    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

  6. Conor said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Peter Clinch says...

    Quoted message said:
    MrBitsy said:

    Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them - fact of
    modern life.

    I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    they're bigger than me.


    No, you shouldn't put yourself in a position where you can't be seen.

    It's not always about being in a position where one cannot be seen,
    rather it's sometimes about being on the same stretch of road as someone
    who just cannot be bothered looking.

    Cheers,
    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

  7. MrBitsy said:
    Ian Smith said:

    ["Followup-To:" header set to uk.rec.cycling.]

    MrBitsy said:


    My personal thought on this is it takes two to create an incident
    #1.

    #1 Except in those circumstances you could do nothing. Plane
    crashes on you, driver has heart attack and his vehicle bursts
    through the railings straight at you - acts of god.

    Things like, HGV driver pulls up alongside at traffic light junction
    then drives over you when the lights go green? Things like the very
    case under discussion, for example?

    Whoosh

    Go on... Please don't blame Ian for your failure to make yourself clear.

    Cheers,
    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

  8. Ekul Namsob said:
    MrBitsy said:
    Peter Clinch said:

    MrBitsy wrote:

    > Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them - fact
    > of modern life.

    I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    they're bigger than me.

    He has said no such thing.

    "The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear" seems quite similar
    to "I shouldn't be close to lorries because they're bigger than me."


    It might seem to be, but it isn't.

  9. Brimstone said:
    Ekul Namsob said:
    MrBitsy said:

    Peter Clinch wrote:
    > MrBitsy wrote:
    >
    >> Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them - fact
    >> of modern life.
    >
    > I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    > in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    > they're bigger than me.

    He has said no such thing.

    "The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear" seems quite similar
    to "I shouldn't be close to lorries because they're bigger than me."


    It might seem to be, but it isn't.

    Go on...

    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

  10. Ekul Namsob said:
    Brimstone said:
    Ekul Namsob said:

    MrBitsy <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > Peter Clinch wrote:
    >> MrBitsy wrote:
    >>
    >>> Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them -
    >>> fact of modern life.
    >>
    >> I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    >> in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    >> they're bigger than me.
    >
    > He has said no such thing.

    "The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear" seems quite
    similar to "I shouldn't be close to lorries because they're bigger
    than me."


    It might seem to be, but it isn't.

    Go on...


    "Go on" what?

  11. Brimstone said:
    Ekul Namsob said:
    Brimstone said:

    Ekul Namsob wrote:
    > MrBitsy <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> Peter Clinch wrote:
    >>> MrBitsy wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them -
    >>>> fact of modern life.
    >>>
    >>> I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    >>> in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    >>> they're bigger than me.
    >>
    >> He has said no such thing.
    >
    > "The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear" seems quite
    > similar to "I shouldn't be close to lorries because they're bigger
    > than me."
    >
    It might seem to be, but it isn't.

    Go on...


    "Go on" what?

    Rather than writing in riddles, would you care to communicate?

    For example, in what way do you believe that the two statements above
    are significantly different?

    Is that easy enough for you to understand?

    Thanks awfully.

    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

  12. Ekul Namsob said:
    Brimstone said:
    Ekul Namsob said:

    Brimstone <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > Ekul Namsob wrote:
    >> MrBitsy <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> Peter Clinch wrote:
    >>>> MrBitsy wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them -
    >>>>> fact of modern life.
    >>>>
    >>>> I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be
    >>>> working in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to
    >>>> lorries because they're bigger than me.
    >>>
    >>> He has said no such thing.
    >>
    >> "The lorry is bigger than the cyclist. Keep clear" seems quite
    >> similar to "I shouldn't be close to lorries because they're bigger
    >> than me."
    >>
    > It might seem to be, but it isn't.

    Go on...


    "Go on" what?

    Rather than writing in riddles, would you care to communicate?

    For example, in what way do you believe that the two statements above
    are significantly different?

    My comment is a recommendation to take control of the situation when
    possible. We all know (well most of us) that that is not always possible in
    the real world.

    Yours seem to have the air of somebody in a panic, but I suspect you meant
    something different.

    Quoted message said:

    Is that easy enough for you to understand?

    Thanks awfully.

    You're welcome.

  13. Ian Smith said:

    Not while it's causing you irritation.

    It simply demonstrates your stupidity and contempt for others. You are
    pretending to want a debate while acting like a childish spoiled brat.
    So I'll respond as I would to a child acting in the way you are and
    ignore your pathetic behaviour.

  14. Danny Colyer said:
    Steve Firth said:

    Perhaps you simply wait until the lights change then move off? That's
    what I do on my bicycle.

    It's too late now, but perhaps before making yourself look stupid you
    should have considered the bit in brackets from Pete's example:

    Maybe if Pete didn't want to look stupid he shouldn't have published
    somethign so ludicrous and if you didn't want to look stupid you should
    not have quoted such silly material as if it were a revelation?
    And maybe, since I was not responding to a point made by "Pete" but to
    one made by "Ian" and the material you posted did not come from the post
    I was replying to you could avoid accusations of stupidity by learning
    to read?

    Just a suggestion, like.

  15. In article <1i98dne.6vls9y1539usfN%
    [email hidden]>, Ekul Namsob says...

    Quoted message said:
    Conor said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Peter Clinch says...

    Quoted message said:

    MrBitsy wrote:

    > Hey, the roads can be made dangerous by those that use them - fact of
    > modern life.

    I know that, and you know that, but Brimstone seems to be working
    in some fantasy land where I shouldn't be close to lorries because
    they're bigger than me.


    No, you shouldn't put yourself in a position where you can't be seen.

    It's not always about being in a position where one cannot be seen,
    rather it's sometimes about being on the same stretch of road as someone
    who just cannot be bothered looking.


    Rubbish.

    --
    Conor

    I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.

  16. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    No, you shouldn't put yourself in a position where you can't be
    seen.

    It's not always about being in a position where one cannot be seen,
    rather it's sometimes about being on the same stretch of road as
    someone who just cannot be bothered looking.


    Rubbish.

    The post that started this thread dealt with just such a death.

  17. x-no-archive:Ian Smith said:

    taht states that

    phwooaarr, a variation on a theme.

  18. Mark T pleasegivegenerously@warmail*turn_up_the_heat_to_reply*.com.invalid said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > No, you shouldn't put yourself in a position where you can't be
    > seen.

    It's not always about being in a position where one cannot be seen,
    rather it's sometimes about being on the same stretch of road as
    someone who just cannot be bothered looking.


    Rubbish.

    The post that started this thread dealt with just such a death.

    No, the post that started this thread dealt with a man dying of
    a suspected heart attack.

    --
    David Taylor

  19. Peter Clinch said:
    Brimstone said:

    If you are a cycling instructor then it should be blindingly obvious to you.

    But the general thrust is quite simple. The lorry is bigger than the
    cyclist. Keep clear.

    If you ever use the roads it should be blindingly obvious that you
    don't always get to choose.

    So let's say I'm at some lights, just behind the ASL and after I
    got there an HGV pulls up behind me. The lights change but I stay
    put a moment (maybe I'm turning right

    So whay aren't you on the right side of the lane?

    Oh, hang on, there are no pavements there, are there?

    --
    "Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
    and presumptuous desire for a second one."
    [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

  20. Steve Firth said:
    Ian Smith said:

    Not while it's causing you irritation.

    It simply demonstrates your stupidity and contempt for others.

    Not all others, just certain others.

    Quoted message said:

    You are pretending to want a debate

    Yes and no. Yes I'm quite happy to discuss the issue, no I don't
    particularly want a debate with you.

    Quoted message said:

    ignore your pathetic behaviour.

    Excellent. A win-win outcome.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.