General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: On airport security

Started by jurgen jorgenson · · Last activity · 4 posts · 303 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 March 2005
Last activity
21 March 2005
Original author
jurgen jorgenson
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
303
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Usenet Posting said:

    On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:52:44 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I actually wrote the dept in charge of transport security this and asked
    "why this was so" and got a canned buearecratic response back, to which
    I replied that they had not answered my question, and got another answer
    back that they had forwarded my letter to the airport authority in
    question and some other dept. - from which I have heard nothing back
    yet, big surprise!

    Letters are good but a call is even better. However that DOES require
    a lot of effort on your part.

    By the way, if you were flying in the US then security is run by the
    TSA. Unless I'm mistaken, every airport in the US now has security
    run by the TSA. So who exactly did you contact? Was it a person at
    the airport?

    --
    I've perfected humility.

    This is a Canadian airport, and the Transport Canada division in charge
    of security is who I wrote to. I havent flown in a long time, be
    interesting to see if my name is "flagged" next time tho...

    Just curious, to those of you stateside that fly lots, do you also
    notice lots of "potential weapons" that could be much more dangerous
    than what you are not allowed thru security in the "secure" area?

  2. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:08:54 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Usenet Posting said:

    On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:52:44 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I actually wrote the dept in charge of transport security this and asked
    "why this was so" and got a canned buearecratic response back, to which
    I replied that they had not answered my question, and got another answer
    back that they had forwarded my letter to the airport authority in
    question and some other dept. - from which I have heard nothing back
    yet, big surprise!

    Letters are good but a call is even better. However that DOES require
    a lot of effort on your part.

    By the way, if you were flying in the US then security is run by the
    TSA. Unless I'm mistaken, every airport in the US now has security
    run by the TSA. So who exactly did you contact? Was it a person at
    the airport?

    --
    I've perfected humility.

    This is a Canadian airport, and the Transport Canada division in charge
    of security is who I wrote to. I havent flown in a long time, be
    interesting to see if my name is "flagged" next time tho...

    Just curious, to those of you stateside that fly lots, do you also
    notice lots of "potential weapons" that could be much more dangerous
    than what you are not allowed thru security in the "secure" area?

    I haven't flown since just after 9/11, but even then you could get on
    the plane with pointy sticks.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "And all this peace has been deceiving,
    I need some wind to get me sailing"

  3. Proton Soup said:

    On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:08:54 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Usenet Posting said:

    On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:52:44 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >I actually wrote the dept in charge of transport security this and asked
    >"why this was so" and got a canned buearecratic response back, to which
    >I replied that they had not answered my question, and got another answer
    >back that they had forwarded my letter to the airport authority in
    >question and some other dept. - from which I have heard nothing back
    >yet, big surprise!

    Letters are good but a call is even better. However that DOES require
    a lot of effort on your part.

    By the way, if you were flying in the US then security is run by the
    TSA. Unless I'm mistaken, every airport in the US now has security
    run by the TSA. So who exactly did you contact? Was it a person at
    the airport?

    --
    I've perfected humility.

    This is a Canadian airport, and the Transport Canada division in charge
    of security is who I wrote to. I havent flown in a long time, be
    interesting to see if my name is "flagged" next time tho...

    Just curious, to those of you stateside that fly lots, do you also
    notice lots of "potential weapons" that could be much more dangerous
    than what you are not allowed thru security in the "secure" area?

    I haven't flown since just after 9/11, but even then you could get on
    the plane with pointy sticks.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "And all this peace has been deceiving,
    I need some wind to get me sailing"

    I spent about 1/2 hour in the secure area, and in that time saw at least
    6 things available that would make lethal weapons if someone chose to do
    so, some of which could be carried on the plane openly, others not but
    easily hidden as you are generally not searched again after that.

  4. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:38:45 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Proton Soup said:

    On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:08:54 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Usenet Posting wrote:

    >On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:52:44 GMT, jurgen jorgenson <[email hidden]>
    >wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >>I actually wrote the dept in charge of transport security this and asked
    >>"why this was so" and got a canned buearecratic response back, to which
    >>I replied that they had not answered my question, and got another answer
    >>back that they had forwarded my letter to the airport authority in
    >>question and some other dept. - from which I have heard nothing back
    >>yet, big surprise!
    >
    >
    >Letters are good but a call is even better. However that DOES require
    >a lot of effort on your part.
    >
    >By the way, if you were flying in the US then security is run by the
    >TSA. Unless I'm mistaken, every airport in the US now has security
    >run by the TSA. So who exactly did you contact? Was it a person at
    >the airport?
    >
    >
    >--
    >I've perfected humility.

    This is a Canadian airport, and the Transport Canada division in charge
    of security is who I wrote to. I havent flown in a long time, be
    interesting to see if my name is "flagged" next time tho...

    Just curious, to those of you stateside that fly lots, do you also
    notice lots of "potential weapons" that could be much more dangerous
    than what you are not allowed thru security in the "secure" area?

    I haven't flown since just after 9/11, but even then you could get on
    the plane with pointy sticks.

    I spent about 1/2 hour in the secure area, and in that time saw at least
    6 things available that would make lethal weapons if someone chose to do
    so, some of which could be carried on the plane openly, others not but
    easily hidden as you are generally not searched again after that.

    I doubt the restaurants use plastic knives in the back for their food
    prep, either. So that's one potential weak point where you'd have
    some chance at getting an accomplice on the inside. Just apply for a
    job at Ruby Tuesday's, etc.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "And all this peace has been deceiving,
    I need some wind to get me sailing"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.