"joni" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:But from looking below at calories wise, is this suggesting
that you could put on more weight eaiting oats, than eating ice-cream?
the difference is 23 calories.. that is pretty much no difference at all..
especially when you take different brands and demographic variations into
account.
Quoted message said:You would put on more 'weight' with the oats but less bodyfat than if
you ate the icecream I would think.
and what would this non-bodyfat weight be then? water? muslce tissue?
Quoted message said:This is why the calories in,
calories out theory doesnt always hold true as the source (nutrition)
of the calories may determine how the body will use it or store it. I'd
really like to see a study that puts two groups of people on a
maintenance diet of say 2000 calories a day, same exercise etc and
other criteria the same except of where those calories come from. Have
one group eating healthy variety of foods and the other just [censored]
calories. Would one gain (bodyfat)? Would they stay the same? I wonder
what would happen.
The calories labeled on food are energy contents and do not take
digestibility factors into account..
this means that a diet high in simple sugars that has 100kcal and a diet
with complex carbs that has 100kcal will not actually deliver the exact same
ammount of energy because the first does not need to be digested.
I guess the difference however will be rather marginal.
Food calories are a great tool to estimate energy intake for large numbers
of people, but its not a good tool to exactly calculate the energy balance
of an individual unless additional parameters are measured as well.
Quoted message said:joanne