"Man you are a dolt. If I run into the article that makes the comparison
between vegetarian Hindus and non-vegetarian Muslims I will post it."
Good, and until then your track record allows no one to accept this
assertion on it's face. Even if you find such an article, it will show
that all indians eat most of their calories as carbs, the muslims adding a
littleittle meat sometimes, meat is expensive and india is a very poor
country.
"I think I sufficiently showed that Indian, where most of the population
is vegetarian Hindu, has a massive problem with heart disease, among
the Hindu specifically."
Muddled logic and not responsive to the request. You were to show us the
proof of your assertion, you did not, again. As the articles confirm, the
indian paradox is due to recent changes in diet and lifestyle which have
produced higher risk levels, while the previous very high carb diet had
one of the lowest; that is the paradox as to why this should be. Indeed,
you have shown much about your knowledge and use of logic, but nary a bit
about the topic and the assertion made.
"If you fail to see that, then i suggest that you take off your
rose-coloured vegan-activist glasses and come back to the rel world for
one brief moment, just long enough to see that you are wrong about
vegetarian diet and heart disease."
I'm not a vegetarian, not that it matters as this bit of personal attack
is irrelevant as to what you did or didn't fail to support about your
assertion.