A 24x3 is more maneuverable than a 26x3. It makes a difference for
technical riding. With the smaller wheel you're also in the power or
hop position more often.
A 24x3 is also lighter than a 26x3. That weight makes a difference for
hopping and quick maneuvers.
A 26x3 does roll over bumps and obstacles better than a 24x3. The
larger diameter has an advantage there.
It comes down to riding style and riding preference. If you roll a lot
of stuff instead of hopping then you might find the 26x3 to be more to
your liking. The 26x3 is also slightly faster and has more momentum.
Quick maneuvers and tight turns (like tricky downhill switchbacks) can
be more tricky to accomplish on a 26x3 compared to a 24x3. Some of
that also depends on tire choice as well (some tires like to turn
better than others).
I have both a 24x3 and a 26x3. The 26x3 is what I consider my
all-mountain cruiser. It can plow through bumps and roots and cruise
bumpy or rocky trails. The 24x3 is better for any time you want to hop
or maneuver tightly.
For XC riding a 29er is going to be better. A 26x3 is too heavy for XC
style riding. I consider the 26x3 to be a compromise between XC
cruising and 24x3 freeride style riding.
--
john_childs
john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
Team Never Wash Your Muni
'My Gallery' (http://tinyurl.com/3d57bn) :: 'Unicycling Bookmark List'
(http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) :: 'World Clock'
(http://tinyurl.com/2blym3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/70686
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com