Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Motobecane hierarchy

Started by RonSonic · · Last activity · 1 post · 385 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 January 2005
Last activity
2 January 2005
Original author
RonSonic
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
385
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:51:21 +0000, morlok <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    What is/was the order of precedence (in terms of quality) of the
    Motobecane bicycle line?
    I had a Moto Grand Jubile(e), circa 1978, that I lost due to ...(never
    mind).
    I now want to replace it with a bike of the same quality.
    I have seen a few advertised on eBay, including a Grand Jubile, but am
    unfamiliar with what's what today, since I rode my GJ up until 4 years
    ago.

    Getting something comparable will be more a matter of shopping for type than for
    a particular brand name. Motobecane isn't the same company at all. And bikes are
    not the same materials even.

    Having not bought a bike in decades be prepared for some sticker shock - also be
    prepared to be amazed at how well everything works. Shifters shift without much
    attention from the rider and bearings and hubs need little maintenance.

    To my mind the important thing to match is that classic steel frame. I'm a fan
    of steel, rugged and feels good, it's light enough and is almost unconditionally
    reliable. It costs a bit more than aluminum, so what.

    Have fun shopping and let us know what you find.

    Ron

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.