P
paul
Guest
NerdRevenge wrote:
> http://www.limitstogrowth.org/WEB-text/aztlan.html
>
>
> Our southern neighbor is not shy about expressing its intention to
conquer
> the American Southwest, which Mexico regards as territory lost in the
Treaty
> of Guadalupe Hildalgo in 1846. Mexican children are taught in school
that
> the United States stole that land, which they call "Aztlan." Absurd
rantings
> of political extremists? Consider.
>
> . In 1997, then-President Zedillo proclaimed that "I have proudly
affirmed
> that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its
> borders."
>
> . Mexican American Legal Defense Fund founder Mario Obledo stated,
> "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like
it
> should leave. Every constitutional office in California is going to
be held
> by Hispanics in the next 20 years." People who don't like such
demographic
> changes "should go back to Europe." (Incidentally, Mr. Obledo was
also the
> California Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Gov.
Jerry
> Brown.)
>
> . Mexico's President Fox has been unrelenting in his brazen demands
on the
> United States, starting with open borders even before he was elected.
He has
> called for the border to be "a joining line." His visits to the U.S.
have
> been filled with endless requirements for Mexican citizens illegally
in this
> country - free healthcare, taxpayer-subsidized in-state tuition for
illegals
> at state colleges and universities, guestworker programs and amnesty
for
> all.
>
> Incidentally, we shouldn't be surprised at such shenanigans. The
world is
> full of revanchist fantasies, namely that some vague territorial
claim from
> centuries before should form modern national boundaries. The Chinese
invaded
> Tibet in 1949, with the excuse that an eighth-century marriage had
made
> Tibet a part of China. (Is there a Chinese word for lebensraum?)
Chinese
> flowing into Siberia argue that the Amur region is actually part of
China.
> (More on the Chinese demographic invasion of Russia.) The Balkans
have been
> a recent example of the power of warmed-over nationalism, when
Milosovic
> whipped Serbs into a murderous frenzy by summoning the ghosts of the
Battle
> of Kosovo (600 years ago) as he urged them to "take back" what had
been
> stolen from them. In the case of the former Yugoslavia, revanchism
was the
> excuse for genocide.
>
> Encouraged by their leaders in both countries, the 20 million
Mexicans in
> America are similarly emboldened to insist that the United States
surrender
> to their demands, particularly amnesty which will speed the
acquisition of
> political power. And when California becomes majority Mexican around
2028,
> will those people call for political unification with their cultural
> homeland? Their leaders are planning for such a scenario.
>
> It's hard to fathom how America's elected Congressional leaders,
those who
> swore to uphold the Constitution and to protect the nation, are
prepared to
> give it away for some perceived short-term political gain, if that.
The
> front man for globalist corporations who currently occupies the White
House
> is allowing Mexico City to dictate America's immigration policy,
while few
> in his party object. Does anyone think that Vicente Fox cares about
what
> happens to America? He sees the United States as a full refrigerator
and he
> is hungry, very hungry...................
How about bringing some of those troops back from Iraq and using them
to assist law enforcement on our southern border?
Paul
http://www.projectusa.org/
> http://www.limitstogrowth.org/WEB-text/aztlan.html
>
>
> Our southern neighbor is not shy about expressing its intention to
conquer
> the American Southwest, which Mexico regards as territory lost in the
Treaty
> of Guadalupe Hildalgo in 1846. Mexican children are taught in school
that
> the United States stole that land, which they call "Aztlan." Absurd
rantings
> of political extremists? Consider.
>
> . In 1997, then-President Zedillo proclaimed that "I have proudly
affirmed
> that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its
> borders."
>
> . Mexican American Legal Defense Fund founder Mario Obledo stated,
> "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like
it
> should leave. Every constitutional office in California is going to
be held
> by Hispanics in the next 20 years." People who don't like such
demographic
> changes "should go back to Europe." (Incidentally, Mr. Obledo was
also the
> California Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Gov.
Jerry
> Brown.)
>
> . Mexico's President Fox has been unrelenting in his brazen demands
on the
> United States, starting with open borders even before he was elected.
He has
> called for the border to be "a joining line." His visits to the U.S.
have
> been filled with endless requirements for Mexican citizens illegally
in this
> country - free healthcare, taxpayer-subsidized in-state tuition for
illegals
> at state colleges and universities, guestworker programs and amnesty
for
> all.
>
> Incidentally, we shouldn't be surprised at such shenanigans. The
world is
> full of revanchist fantasies, namely that some vague territorial
claim from
> centuries before should form modern national boundaries. The Chinese
invaded
> Tibet in 1949, with the excuse that an eighth-century marriage had
made
> Tibet a part of China. (Is there a Chinese word for lebensraum?)
Chinese
> flowing into Siberia argue that the Amur region is actually part of
China.
> (More on the Chinese demographic invasion of Russia.) The Balkans
have been
> a recent example of the power of warmed-over nationalism, when
Milosovic
> whipped Serbs into a murderous frenzy by summoning the ghosts of the
Battle
> of Kosovo (600 years ago) as he urged them to "take back" what had
been
> stolen from them. In the case of the former Yugoslavia, revanchism
was the
> excuse for genocide.
>
> Encouraged by their leaders in both countries, the 20 million
Mexicans in
> America are similarly emboldened to insist that the United States
surrender
> to their demands, particularly amnesty which will speed the
acquisition of
> political power. And when California becomes majority Mexican around
2028,
> will those people call for political unification with their cultural
> homeland? Their leaders are planning for such a scenario.
>
> It's hard to fathom how America's elected Congressional leaders,
those who
> swore to uphold the Constitution and to protect the nation, are
prepared to
> give it away for some perceived short-term political gain, if that.
The
> front man for globalist corporations who currently occupies the White
House
> is allowing Mexico City to dictate America's immigration policy,
while few
> in his party object. Does anyone think that Vicente Fox cares about
what
> happens to America? He sees the United States as a full refrigerator
and he
> is hungry, very hungry...................
How about bringing some of those troops back from Iraq and using them
to assist law enforcement on our southern border?
Paul
http://www.projectusa.org/
