Quoted message said:Subject: Re: Jan Is Still Selectively Snipping!!!!
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 3/1/2004 1:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>This is cool - people don't need to backup their claims, they only need to
refer to the holy charter.
Anth
We are once again shown the dishonesty of Mark Probert. Since none of the
*gang* could prove their accusations, Mark does this.
Quoted message said:"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:news:[email hidden]...
No time, no thread, no information to verify.
Quoted message said:Snip
LOL!
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Scientific proof or verificability of facts will *not* be required
Quoted message said:in"misc.health.alternative",
Quoted message said:Again, Jan selectively snipped this from the charter and thus changed the
Quoted message said:meaning.
Poor Mark.
Quoted message said:Snip
Now for the truth:
From: Jan ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Gallbladder surgery
View: Complete Thread (90 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-02-28 20:47:23 PST
Quoted message said:Subject: Re: Gallbladder surgery
From: WB [email hidden]
Date: 2/28/2004 6:45 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Bew' qw@nonamewhatsover said:Quoted message said:Proponents of the flushes are required to show that the gall bladder has
fewer stones after a flush. In another post you claim that your doctor
recommended them. Did you have their existence determined by pre-flush
ultrasound and did a post-flush ultrasound show that they were gone? If
not,they you really do not know if the flush was effective in eliminating
them.I have already stated my experience and the experience of others I know
personaly . Don't try and twist it around to me having to prove anything to
you , you are the one who is telling me it doesn't work when from personal
experience I know it does , so you prove your arguement .That old saw "personal experience"
YES!!!
This is a discussion group. People have every right to tell of their own
experience.
Quoted message said:Without objective evidence, your 'experience'
isn't worth a plugged nickel.
Wrong. From the charter.
Alternative approaches to health care are clearly of interest to many readers,
but there is currently no group in which general non-technical discussions
would be appropriate. Discussions do occur in "sci.med",but are generally
counter to that newsgroup's purpose, as readers there have noted.
******"sci.skeptic" is an appropriate newsgroup for scientific investigation of
alternative therapies, but not for general discussion.*******
Scientific proof or verificability of facts will *not* be required
in"misc.health.alternative",
Quoted message said:My 5¢,
It is strange that anecdotes are worth a plugged nickel.
It appears most of the *gang* has one, which the *gang* members never question.
Double standards.
Jan
From: Jan ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: How to debunk just about everything
View: Complete Thread (43 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-02-28 19:45:22 PST
Quoted message said:Subject: Re: How to debunk just about everything
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 2/27/2004 10:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>It's on google somewhere, you would have to fins the original source.
Anth
ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/misc/misc.health.alternative