"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 8, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > >Subject: Re: Mark MD's Hobby > >From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden] > >Date: 6/7/2004 5:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time > >Message-id: <[email hidden]> > > >>>Jan, How and what you or I or anyone else believes as to God, or not God, > >is > >>>best kept between the person and their God. I have defended you he > > snip > > I just had an idea....any "ideas" on a retort to Janster each and every time > she pulls this BS...like most every time she posts?? > > perhaps we can get rid of her if we stick together and reinforce that
her
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> bigotry and religious fanatacism is NOT wanted here??
I am certain that this will be counterproductive. I would suggest a responding to Jan by name moratorium, but, this would have to be
absolutely
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
100%. If she says anything that needs responding to, we have to start a
new
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
thread without mentioning her name. IMNSHO, she thrives on the confrontation.
Oh, like you guys can resist responding to Jan. Never happen.
There is a woman whose name I do not type that I have not responded to in over two years.
Yeah, but she's less prolific than Jan and somewhat less inflammatory. And even if you could resist, someone else won't be able to, be it one of the Rich's or Mark Thorson, or someone.
I can resist more easily thanks to having her in my killfile.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 9, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 8, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
Quoted message said:
> >"Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> >Subject: Re: Mark MD's Hobby >> >From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden] >> >Date: 6/7/2004 5:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time >> >Message-id: <[email hidden]> >> >> >>>Jan, How and what you or I or anyone else believes as to God, or
not
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>God, >> >is >> >>>best kept between the person and their God. I have defended you
he
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> >> snip >> >> I just had an idea....any "ideas" on a retort to Janster each and
every
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>time >> she pulls this BS...like most every time she posts?? >> >> perhaps we can get rid of her if we stick together and reinforce
that
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
her
Quoted message said:
>> bigotry and religious fanatacism is NOT wanted here?? > >I am certain that this will be counterproductive. I would suggest a >responding to Jan by name moratorium, but, this would have to be
absolutely
Quoted message said:
>100%. If she says anything that needs responding to, we have to start
a
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
new
Quoted message said:
>thread without mentioning her name. IMNSHO, she thrives on the >confrontation.
Oh, like you guys can resist responding to Jan. Never happen.
There is a woman whose name I do not type that I have not responded to in over two years.
Yeah, but she's less prolific than Jan and somewhat less inflammatory.
Only to you. 😉
And even if you could resist, someone else won't
Quoted message said:
be able to, be it one of the Rich's or Mark Thorson, or someone.
That is why I said it would have to be 100%. Anything short, it would not work.
Quoted message said:
I can resist more easily thanks to having her in my killfile.
"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 9, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > In article <[email hidden]>, > M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 8, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t [email hidden]> wrote: > > > > Oh, like you guys can resist responding to Jan. Never happen.
There is a woman whose name I do not type that I have not responded to in over two years.
Yeah, but she's less prolific than Jan and somewhat less inflammatory.
Only to you. 😉
I admit it's kind of like the difference between infinity squared and infinity cubed.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
And even if you could resist, someone else won't be able to, be it one of the Rich's or Mark Thorson, or someone.
That is why I said it would have to be 100%. Anything short, it would not work.
Quoted message said:
I can resist more easily thanks to having her in my killfile.
You are using a 'crutch'.
On the contrary, unlike some posters here, I am of the opinion that ignoring Jan and thus not giving her the attention she so desperately craves is the cruelest thing one can do to her.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 9, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 9, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
Quoted message said:
> >"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> In article <[email hidden]>, >> M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 8, 2004 <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t >[email hidden]> wrote: >> > >> >> Oh, like you guys can resist responding to Jan. Never happen. > >There is a woman whose name I do not type that I have not responded to
in
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>over two years.
Yeah, but she's less prolific than Jan and somewhat less inflammatory.
Only to you. 😉
I admit it's kind of like the difference between infinity squared and infinity cubed.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
And even if you could resist, someone else won't be able to, be it one of the Rich's or Mark Thorson, or someone.
That is why I said it would have to be 100%. Anything short, it would not work.
Quoted message said:
I can resist more easily thanks to having her in my killfile.
You are using a 'crutch'.
On the contrary, unlike some posters here, I am of the opinion that ignoring Jan and thus not giving her the attention she so desperately craves is the cruelest thing one can do to her.
Agreed. That is the basis for my idea that we do not respond to her by name, snip out her header, and respond only the to 'substance" if we so desire. Depersonalize it.
