General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Malaria Recap

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 316 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 November 2004
Last activity
29 November 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
316
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sorry, a feeble attempt at two of the 4 extra point questions posed so
    far, answers either incomplete or don't address the question. How/when
    was malaria intrduced into the americas, what prevents easy developement
    of a vaccine, what disease is a genetic aadaptation to malaria, for what
    disease was malaria given on purpose as a cure?

    Quoted message said:

    Malaria is an old world disease that was introduced into the new world
    by disease carriers.

    No mosquitoes equals no malaria. Cold weather naturally kills off
    mosquitoes.
    Or, no disease carriers equals no malaria.

    An additional problem in the tropics is that monkeys and apes are also
    disease carriers. Mosquitoes thrive in hot weather, rain forests, and
    swamps.

    http://archive.idrc.ca/books/reports/1996/01-05e.html
    "In 1987, Dr. Manuel Elkin Patarroyo, a biochemist from Colombia,
    developed the first synthetic vaccine against the Plasmodium
    falciparum parasite. The vaccine is still being developed and has not
    yet proven to reduce deaths in Africa. In 1992, Dr. Patarroyo donated
    the vaccine to the World Health Organization."

    CORRECTION! There is a malaria vaccine. It simply cannot be shown
    that it works. Probably because like all allopathic vaccines and
    drugs, they fundamentally don't work!
    --
    john gohde
    http://gnu-dictionary.naturalhealthperspective.com/

  2. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Malaria Recap
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2004 5:41 PM

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, a feeble attempt at two of the 4 extra point questions posed

    I would say that feeble is the person who thinks that 'the Man' is answering
    their questions.

    Feeble is the twit with the egg on their face.

    Cheers ...

  3. "Able Grable" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Malaria Recap
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2004 5:41 PM

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, a feeble attempt at two of the 4 extra point questions posed

    I would say that feeble is the person who thinks that 'the Man' is


    answering

    Quoted message said:

    their questions.

    Feeble is the twit with the egg on their face.

    Cheers ...

    It is also pretty feeble to think that every lame posting
    by Gohde "the Man" needs a counter posting. I am
    referring to Mark de Toad record of vacuous posting
    to the usenet whichh equals or exceeds Gohde's. IMO

  4. "William_Noyes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Able Grable" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Malaria Recap
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2004 5:41 PM

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, a feeble attempt at two of the 4 extra point questions
    posed

    I would say that feeble is the person who thinks that 'the Man'
    is


    answering

    Quoted message said:

    their questions.

    Feeble is the twit with the egg on their face.

    Cheers ...

    It is also pretty feeble to think that every lame posting
    by Gohde "the Man" needs a counter posting. I am
    referring to Mark de Toad record of vacuous posting
    to the usenet whichh equals or exceeds Gohde's. IMO


    Seconded
    MikeV

  5. William_Noyes said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Malaria Recap
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2004 5:41 PM

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, a feeble attempt at two of the 4 extra point questions posed

    I would say that feeble is the person who thinks that 'the Man' is


    answering

    Quoted message said:

    their questions.

    Feeble is the twit with the egg on their face.

    Cheers ...

    It is also pretty feeble to think that every lame posting
    by Gohde "the Man" needs a counter posting. I am
    referring to Mark de Toad record of vacuous posting
    to the usenet whichh equals or exceeds Gohde's. IMO

    What is lame is all these posts from science bigots, such as yourself.

    Malaria was eradicated in America by controlling the misquotes.
    Medicine had next to nothing to do with it. It was a natural
    bi-product of land development.

    The malaria vaccine does not work, period.

    The only reason that the other vaccines appear to work is purely by
    coincidence. Here, is a case where the vaccine is not being assisted
    by the other real measures that are required to control infectious
    disease. Naturally, the vaccine is falling flat on its face because
    vaccines fundamentally don't work.

    Just my opinion, but I am right as usual. 🙂
    --
    john gohde

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.