Quoted message said:Subject: Re: Legal Logic Lesson
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 7/1/2003 8:42 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>(Jan) said:Quoted message said:From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 7/1/2003 6:06 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Umm, Peter.
Still waiting for confirmation on the information you posted.
Got any?
What is taking sooooooooooooooooo long???
You had time to give this speech, but still no way for us to check your
information.Jan
I have given my response. That you choose to not understand that being
a witness is not "on trial" is not my problem. No further evidence is
required other than an understanding of what the words mean.
No, I don't think so.
I still have the same questions.
We will see if you can provide us with something other than just your word.
Quoted message said:He is going to court at the invitation of the state of Wisconsin as an
expert witness.
Expert witness of what?
Quoted message said:He did not ask to be there - they invited him.
And we can verify this how?
Either you have a reference or you don't.
Which is it Peter??
Quoted message said:Remove the scales of hate from your eyes for just a moment and you
might see the truth.
Insult noted and false claim.
Now, I will expect you to reference what you wrote.
If you can't, we will know you are making things up AGAIN.
That's how it works.
Jan