Here's a summary of this thread before it degenerates into a soup of
immature name calling.
Points raised :-
Main point
The studies on Laetrile in mice show's that is is a potential anti
metastasis drug.
Laetrile is 'un toxic from a pharmaceutical point of view.'
Laetrile can be toxic to humans.
Laetrile can be more toxic when taken by mouth.
Laetrile is consumed in large doses by the Hunza in the form of apricot
pits.
Laetrile was suppressed because it kills/murders people
Laetrile in respect of the main point is an 'unproven' therapy.
Laetrile was shown to be effective in halting metastasis in mice.
Laetrile was shown to be ineffective in curing cancer in humans.
Quackwatch has claims without references.
Quackwatch appears to have disinformation about the toxicity of Laetrile.
Quackwatch doesn't show information about the anti metastasis properties of
Laetrile.
Quackwatch attacks unproven methods.
Quackwatch contains lies.
Ralph Moss is a liar in respect that he lied about his post at Sloan.
Ralph Moss was privy to the Laetrile research at Sloan.
There is no conspiracy behind Laetrile.
There is a conspiracy behind Laetrile.
People believe that 'alties' blame all of mainstream medicine as a
conspiracy.
Laetrile was tested in humans for anti cancer properties.
There exists arguments about how the trials of Laetrile were done.
Such as follow ups and time of experiments.
Why is Laetrile still being investigated?
A conspiracy isn't a conspiracy if it's proven.
Finally :-
Laetrile is an ongoing argument that probably will never be solved.
Thoughts?