Re: just curious

"Mu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

teachrmama said:

Quoted message said:

Simplification: You made the statement that "My blood pressure was at
stroke level less than a year ago (200/100) I have lost 90 pounds, and
it now averages 120/70. Losing the weight really did help me."

And it DID help me, Mu. How can you possibly disagree with that? The
fact
that the other factors are intertwimed does not change the fact that
losing
weight did, indeed, help me lower my bolld pressure. So did exercising
more. So did changing my diet. All 3, intertwined. I still have no
idea
why you posted what you did.

Watch the slow, bouncing ball and read along.

If you cannot separate these intertwined activities then it is
impossible to tell if one, all, some, none or any has any
effect on your BP.

Think of your exercise, weight loss, change of eating...all the things
you have mentioned, think of them as if they were a, er, a baseball
team, yeah! Who won the game for you? Your pitcher, Mr. Weight Loss? Aw,
he did a great job, he shutout the Demon Overeaters..but what about Mr.
Exercise, your All Star shortstop, he gobbled up calories and threw them
to...Mr. Metabolism who caught them an...and... gave the ball to Mr.
Doctor Umpire who said, "End of inning, let's play two (no, that was
Ernie Banks), let's play the next inning. Score is Demon Overeaters, 12,
Team Teachrmama, -19 (you see your supposed to be losing, right!) Soon
Nurse UmpireBPReader calls the plate umpire, Dr., uh, Dr. UmpireDoctor
and tells him how badly, no, goodly you have lost!

Game Over, Winner TeachermamaTeam !!!

Now, who was responsible for winning the game with the OverEaters?

Once again, Mu, in spite of your seeming desparate need to be correct, I DID
NOT say that ONLY weight loss caused my lower blood pressure. I DID say
that weight loss HELPED. Are you trying to say that the potcher did NOT
help win the game? That the short stop did NOT help win the game? Are you
trying to say that because the eating, weight loss, and exercise were
intertwined, that they did NOT help lower my blood pressure? Or are you
saying that because I only said that the weight loss helped me, and I did
not mention the healthy eating and exercise in my original response the you
are justified in what you are saying? Is it about accuracy? Or about you?

teachrmama said:

"Mu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

teachrmama said:

> Simplification: You made the statement that "My blood pressure was at
> stroke level less than a year ago (200/100) I have lost 90 pounds, and
> it now averages 120/70. Losing the weight really did help me."

And it DID help me, Mu. How can you possibly disagree with that? The
fact
that the other factors are intertwimed does not change the fact that
losing
weight did, indeed, help me lower my bolld pressure. So did exercising
more. So did changing my diet. All 3, intertwined. I still have no
idea
why you posted what you did.

Watch the slow, bouncing ball and read along.

If you cannot separate these intertwined activities then it is
impossible to tell if one, all, some, none or any has any
effect on your BP.

Think of your exercise, weight loss, change of eating...all the things
you have mentioned, think of them as if they were a, er, a baseball
team, yeah! Who won the game for you? Your pitcher, Mr. Weight Loss? Aw,
he did a great job, he shutout the Demon Overeaters..but what about Mr.
Exercise, your All Star shortstop, he gobbled up calories and threw them
to...Mr. Metabolism who caught them an...and... gave the ball to Mr.
Doctor Umpire who said, "End of inning, let's play two (no, that was
Ernie Banks), let's play the next inning. Score is Demon Overeaters, 12,
Team Teachrmama, -19 (you see your supposed to be losing, right!) Soon
Nurse UmpireBPReader calls the plate umpire, Dr., uh, Dr. UmpireDoctor
and tells him how badly, no, goodly you have lost!

Game Over, Winner TeachermamaTeam !!!

Now, who was responsible for winning the game with the OverEaters?

Once again, Mu, in spite of your seeming desparate need to be correct, I DID
NOT say that ONLY weight loss caused my lower blood pressure. I DID say
that weight loss HELPED. Are you trying to say that the potcher did NOT
help win the game? That the short stop did NOT help win the game? Are you
trying to say that because the eating, weight loss, and exercise were
intertwined, that they did NOT help lower my blood pressure? Or are you
saying that because I only said that the weight loss helped me, and I did
not mention the healthy eating and exercise in my original response the you
are justified in what you are saying? Is it about accuracy? Or about you?

It's about circular arguments and I will have no more wth you.
--
After four months and being an American in Taipei I never want to hear
´Oh your koala very cute¡ ever again. If there is an off chance that if
I do encounter a koala, I may have to punch it in the face as a result.
Even a pretty koala looks ugly with a broken nose.

Mu said:

teachrmama said:

"Mu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:50:45 -0700, teachrmama wrote:

>> Simplification: You made the statement that "My blood pressure was at
>> stroke level less than a year ago (200/100) I have lost 90 pounds, and
>> it now averages 120/70. Losing the weight really did help me."
>
> And it DID help me, Mu. How can you possibly disagree with that? The
> fact
> that the other factors are intertwimed does not change the fact that
> losing
> weight did, indeed, help me lower my bolld pressure. So did exercising
> more. So did changing my diet. All 3, intertwined. I still have no
> idea
> why you posted what you did.

Watch the slow, bouncing ball and read along.

If you cannot separate these intertwined activities then it is
impossible to tell if one, all, some, none or any has any
effect on your BP.

Think of your exercise, weight loss, change of eating...all the things
you have mentioned, think of them as if they were a, er, a baseball
team, yeah! Who won the game for you? Your pitcher, Mr. Weight Loss? Aw,
he did a great job, he shutout the Demon Overeaters..but what about Mr.
Exercise, your All Star shortstop, he gobbled up calories and threw them
to...Mr. Metabolism who caught them an...and... gave the ball to Mr.
Doctor Umpire who said, "End of inning, let's play two (no, that was
Ernie Banks), let's play the next inning. Score is Demon Overeaters, 12,
Team Teachrmama, -19 (you see your supposed to be losing, right!) Soon
Nurse UmpireBPReader calls the plate umpire, Dr., uh, Dr. UmpireDoctor
and tells him how badly, no, goodly you have lost!

Game Over, Winner TeachermamaTeam !!!

Now, who was responsible for winning the game with the OverEaters?

Once again, Mu, in spite of your seeming desparate need to be correct, I DID
NOT say that ONLY weight loss caused my lower blood pressure. I DID say
that weight loss HELPED. Are you trying to say that the potcher did NOT
help win the game? That the short stop did NOT help win the game? Are you
trying to say that because the eating, weight loss, and exercise were
intertwined, that they did NOT help lower my blood pressure? Or are you
saying that because I only said that the weight loss helped me, and I did
not mention the healthy eating and exercise in my original response the you
are justified in what you are saying? Is it about accuracy? Or about you?

It's about circular arguments and I will have no more wth you.

Better plonk her now, coward.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Mu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

teachrmama said:

"Mu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:50:45 -0700, teachrmama wrote:

>> Simplification: You made the statement that "My blood pressure was at
>> stroke level less than a year ago (200/100) I have lost 90 pounds,
>> and
>> it now averages 120/70. Losing the weight really did help me."
>
> And it DID help me, Mu. How can you possibly disagree with that? The
> fact
> that the other factors are intertwimed does not change the fact that
> losing
> weight did, indeed, help me lower my bolld pressure. So did exercising
> more. So did changing my diet. All 3, intertwined. I still have no
> idea
> why you posted what you did.

Watch the slow, bouncing ball and read along.

If you cannot separate these intertwined activities then it is
impossible to tell if one, all, some, none or any has any
effect on your BP.

Think of your exercise, weight loss, change of eating...all the things
you have mentioned, think of them as if they were a, er, a baseball
team, yeah! Who won the game for you? Your pitcher, Mr. Weight Loss? Aw,
he did a great job, he shutout the Demon Overeaters..but what about Mr.
Exercise, your All Star shortstop, he gobbled up calories and threw them
to...Mr. Metabolism who caught them an...and... gave the ball to Mr.
Doctor Umpire who said, "End of inning, let's play two (no, that was
Ernie Banks), let's play the next inning. Score is Demon Overeaters, 12,
Team Teachrmama, -19 (you see your supposed to be losing, right!) Soon
Nurse UmpireBPReader calls the plate umpire, Dr., uh, Dr. UmpireDoctor
and tells him how badly, no, goodly you have lost!

Game Over, Winner TeachermamaTeam !!!

Now, who was responsible for winning the game with the OverEaters?

Once again, Mu, in spite of your seeming desparate need to be correct, I
DID
NOT say that ONLY weight loss caused my lower blood pressure. I DID say
that weight loss HELPED. Are you trying to say that the potcher did NOT
help win the game? That the short stop did NOT help win the game? Are
you
trying to say that because the eating, weight loss, and exercise were
intertwined, that they did NOT help lower my blood pressure? Or are you
saying that because I only said that the weight loss helped me, and I did
not mention the healthy eating and exercise in my original response the
you
are justified in what you are saying? Is it about accuracy? Or about
you?

It's about circular arguments and I will have no more wth you.

Aw, gee, bummer.