Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: John Bickmore asking for help with a very difficult problem

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 580 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
1 May 2008
Last activity
2 May 2008
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
580
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Scott said:

    John, I'm not sure I'm following you. You say you were born on a US
    Army base in the US. But, were you the child of citizens of some
    other country? I only ask because if your parents were US citizens,
    then the fact that you were born on an Army base is irrelevant. If
    you're a citizen, you're a citizen. They can't make YOU leave no
    matter what your wife's status is, and your children are citizens,
    too, so long as YOU are a citizen, assuming they were born in the US.

    I think the original army base comment was just
    John trying to emphasize his patriotic bona fides.

    Of course they can't deport him. And if he's a
    citizen, his children are citizens, whether they
    were born in the US or not. But what does
    that matter if they deport his wife? In today's
    society, it's not considered normal to just wave
    goodbye to your wife or mother as she's deported,
    so as a practical matter he and the kids would
    have to try to emigrate to Canadia.

    Quoted message said:

    Of course, you could just tell 'em you messed up in the original
    application and your wife is actually Mexican.

    Dream on. If you and your friends haven't had to
    deal with the walking screwup that is ICE, be happy.
    They are entirely capable of penalizing you for
    trying to do the right thing.

    Ben

  2. On May 1, 3:23 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I think the original army base comment was just
    John trying to emphasize his patriotic bona fides.

    You are probably correct.

    Can you post a link to the www.schwartzsoft.com page where you are
    getting all these interpreters? Both myself and Amit could use them.

  3. On May 1, 3:23 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    And if he's a
    citizen, his children are citizens, whether they
    were born in the US or not.

    This is not true. If a child was born outside of the US then the
    father's marital status at the time of the child's birth, and his
    residency status prior to the birth, determines whether the child is a
    US citizen.

  4. Robert Chung said:

    On May 1, 3:23 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    And if he's a
    citizen, his children are citizens, whether they
    were born in the US or not.

    This is not true. If a child was born outside of the US then the
    father's marital status at the time of the child's birth, and his
    residency status prior to the birth, determines whether the child is a
    US citizen.

    The bottom line is, Bickmore needs both a lawyer and some leverage,
    and I'm not sure he's going to find either one here in rbr.

  5. Robert Chung said:

    On May 1, 3:23 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    And if he's a
    citizen, his children are citizens, whether they
    were born in the US or not.

    This is not true. If a child was born outside of the US then the
    father's marital status at the time of the child's birth, and his
    residency status prior to the birth, determines whether the child is a
    US citizen.

    You are correct that I assumed too much. On reading the
    current law (since 1986) it appears that it depends on
    how many years the U.S. citizen parent has lived in the U.S.
    before the child's birth (I suspect that Bickmore meets
    the requirement). I didn't see where marital status
    entered into it, but you're likely much more familiar
    with this law than I am.

    http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-..html

    I agree that he needs expert intervention which RBR
    doesn't provide, although there has been some decent
    advice in the thread.

    Ben

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.