You're way out of bounds. Perhaps there should be a B-sample of the photographs before you convict him. There is at least a 99% chance that he isn't sporting a camel toe or a 3-story forehead. Besides, the photos could have been manipulated by Lance Armstrong in a plot to throw WADA off his trail. Perhaps it's a vanishing camel toe. How can you waltz in here and convict the poor guy on such flimzy evidence? Clearly the guy deserves a second chance.
