General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Infection / bloodletting / phlebotomy

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 333 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 September 2004
Last activity
11 September 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
333
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Gosh you are slow, this story has been out there for some time recently.
    In a word, antibotics, a far far superior way to deal with bacteria. Do
    we want to go back to the trial and error risk of this practice? It had a
    very poor rate of success, baterial infections were a common cause of
    death and it did nothing for those infections caused by viruses.

    Quoted message said:

    -------------------------------
    http://my.webmd.com/content/article/94/102585.htm?z=1728_00000_1000_nb_06

    "Staph thrives on iron compounds, scavenging it from the animals it infects. It
    obtains most of the iron it needs to grow during infection .... Specifically,
    it prefers a kind of iron found in heme ....." "If no heme is available, the
    bacterium's chances of thriving may fail."

    Extreme Technique

    What does all this have to do with bloodletting?

    Skaar's team didn't address bloodletting.

    But the idea boils down to this: The less blood that's available, the harder it
    is for the bacterium to scrounge up enough heme to thrive.

    "Bloodletting in the preantibiotic era may have been an effective mechanism for
    starving bacterial pathogens of iron and slowing bacterial growth," writes
    Rouault.

    These days, we have different ways to handle infections.

    Though bloodletting is out of vogue -- and none of the researchers is
    suggesting its revival -- the reasons why it sometimes worked may be clearer.

    They say that targeting or inhibiting the bacteria's ability to obtain iron is
    a promising area of research that may create novel options for therapy against
    infection.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Who loves ya.
    Tom
    Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
    Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore
    DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking

  2. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Infection / bloodletting / phlebotomy

    Bloodletting's Benefits

    Ancient Medical Practice Worked, Study Shows

    By Miranda Hitti
    WebMD Medical News Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario, MD
    on Friday, September 10, 2004

    More From WebMD

    Sept. 10, 2004 -- Score one for the medical experts of the distant past. The
    old practice of bloodletting may have worked, and new research may show us why.

    Before antibiotics were developed, bloodletting was used to treat serious
    illnesses.

    In fact, America's first president, George Washington, is said to have had 80
    ounces of his blood drained from his body in a last-ditch effort to save him in
    his last hours of life.

    He had fallen ill after being caught in sleet and snow while riding around his
    farm a few days earlier, according to biographer Jack Warren Jr.

    It didn't work. Washington died on Dec. 14, 1799.

    Some experts blame the bloodletting; others say infection was the problem.

    Bloodletting was going out of style by then, but the fact that such an
    important person was given that treatment indicates it was once a
    state-of-the-art technique.

    "As recently as 1942, Sir William Osler's highly regarded medical textbook
    advocated bloodletting as a treatment for acute pneumonia," writes Tracey
    Rouault, MD, of the National Institutes of Health in Science.

    Shedding New Light

    Those bygone doctors probably didn't know why bloodletting sometimes worked,
    but new research presents a possible reason.

    Scientists, including Eric Skaar of the University of Chicago, recently studied
    a type of bacteria called Staphylococcus aureus or simply "staph." This
    bacteria, which can be carried on the skin or nostrils of healthy people is
    also responsible for skin infections such as boils or pimples. The bacteria can
    also cause serious infections of the blood, bones, and lungs (pneumonia).
    Recently these bacteria, like many others, have become more and more resistant
    to antibiotic therapy.

    Staph thrives on iron compounds, scavenging it from the animals it infects. It
    obtains most of the iron it needs to grow during infection.

    Specifically, it prefers a kind of iron found in heme, the molecule in red
    blood cells that helps carry oxygen. It's as if the bacterium scans its host's
    menu of iron compounds, hoping to find heme.

    "Heme iron is the preferred iron source during the initiation of infection,"
    write Skaar and colleagues in the Sept. 10 issue of Science.

    If no heme is available, the bacterium's chances of thriving may fail.

    The researchers identified a gene cluster within the bacteria that promotes
    heme transfer, to the bacterium's advantage.

    But when those genes mutate, it's harder for the bacteria to launch a
    successful infection, according to the researchers' studies of mice and worms.

    Extreme Technique

    What does all this have to do with bloodletting?

    Skaar's team didn't address bloodletting.

    But the idea boils down to this: The less blood that's available, the harder it
    is for the bacterium to scrounge up enough heme to thrive.

    "Bloodletting in the preantibiotic era may have been an effective mechanism for
    starving bacterial pathogens of iron and slowing bacterial growth," writes
    Rouault.

    These days, we have different ways to handle infections.

    Though bloodletting is out of vogue -- and none of the researchers is
    suggesting its revival -- the reasons why it sometimes worked may be clearer.

    They say that targeting or inhibiting the bacteria's ability to obtain iron is
    a promising area of research that may create novel options for therapy against
    infection.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ------

    SOURCES: Skaar, E. Science, Sept. 10, 2004; vol 305: pp 1626-1628. Rouault, T.,
    Science, Sept. 10, 2004; vol 305: pp 1577-1578. News release, Science. WebMD
    Health: "Some Things In Medicine Never Change." George Washington Biography,
    Jack Warren Jr.

    Who loves ya.
    Tom
    Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
    Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore
    DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.