General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Illegal To Protect Oneself From Harm?

Started by Jerry · · Last activity · 3 posts · 238 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 April 2005
Last activity
7 April 2005
Original author
Jerry
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
238
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Axel of the North! said:

    in regards to the Minnesota CCW breakthrough...

    Yeah yeah.. i know. they could issue ccw permits to individuals at
    their "discretion" before and could improve on that. but, in the big
    picture, i can imagine some people down the line may not be able to
    legally carry on their person this ultimate self-defense "accessory".

    Like here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1363442/posts

    this bums me out. so, mr. hanson and whatever other pro-actively
    "healthy" Minnesotans may be lurking out there... how do you feel
    about this? seems like kind of an anti-fitness threat, if you ask
    me... heh heh.

    I don't own a handgun yet but I fully intend to get my cc permit this
    time if the appeals court reverses the Ramsey court decision.

    jdege mentioned that permits are being issued under the old law. What is
    the old law? Is that where you have to show a reasonable need to carry?

    --
    Jerry

  2. On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:36:01 GMT, Jerry
    <jabeach@DONT_SPAM_ME_citlink.net> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:
    Axel of the North! said:

    in regards to the Minnesota CCW breakthrough...

    Yeah yeah.. i know. they could issue ccw permits to individuals at
    their "discretion" before and could improve on that. but, in the big
    picture, i can imagine some people down the line may not be able to
    legally carry on their person this ultimate self-defense "accessory".

    Like here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1363442/posts

    this bums me out. so, mr. hanson and whatever other pro-actively
    "healthy" Minnesotans may be lurking out there... how do you feel
    about this? seems like kind of an anti-fitness threat, if you ask
    me... heh heh.

    I don't own a handgun yet but I fully intend to get my cc permit this
    time if the appeals court reverses the Ramsey court decision.

    jdege mentioned that permits are being issued under the old law. What is
    the old law? Is that where you have to show a reasonable need to carry?

    Kinda. You have to state a purpose for the permit. Go get your
    permit to purchase a pistol. You need that in Minnesota to buy a
    pistol (unless you are a permit holder). It's either free or $5.00, I
    don't recall. Anywho, it's the same form as the old permit to carry.
    You just don't have to fill out the entire form if you just want it to
    purchase a pistol.

    Aren't you in Forest Lake? You should ask around and find out what
    the police chief's view of citizens being able to carry. Being in
    Forest Lake might be advantageous to you to apply under the old law.
    Also check out this site:
    http://mnccrn.org/

    Go to the old CCRN site and look up the hardcore members. They might
    be able to give you some info on your police chief. I did say police
    chief BTW. Under the old law, you applied to your chief. With the
    new law, it was your county sheriff.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Jerry <jabeach@DONT_SPAM_ME_citlink.net> writes:
    [snip]

    Quoted message said:


    jdege mentioned that permits are being issued under the old law. What is
    the old law? Is that where you have to show a reasonable need to carry?

    If it's like most states that have/had such laws: Yes. A "reasonable
    need to carry" or the right friends on the gun board (or whomever
    renders such judgements).

    --
    Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
    WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
    spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
    [email hidden] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.