UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Helmet Poll: First Hand Experience

Started by Sorni · · Last activity · 1 post · 395 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 June 2006
Last activity
12 June 2006
Original author
Sorni
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
395
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sorni said:
    Tony Raven said:
    Paul Murphy said:


    An issue on the news this morning here in the UK (Harold Shipman).
    There's also that recent case of a nurse who was deliberately making
    people sick so that he could miraculously resuscitate them and be
    thought of as the hero. Worrying stuff.

    Quoted message said:

    Unless you look at the statistics and find you are much more at
    danger from your doctors incompetence than you ever are from his
    intent. But we know some people here don't do statistics.

    OK, here's a question: What if the statistics said that *50%* of
    doctors are incompetent (or worse)? Or *90%*? Would you stop
    getting medical care? Or would you stay with your current doctor if
    he or she has earned your trust -- or use care and scrutiny in
    finding a new one -- like presumably you did in the first place?

    IOW, what good are your precious statistics in practical terms in this
    (your) example? How do your choices, decisions or behaviors change? It
    might be good to know, but it doesn't /always/ have any tangible
    benefit.

    One more thing. Statistics like the above hypothetical example (50% of
    doctors incompetent) ARE useful in terms of public policy, professional
    boards (increasing minimum standards), etc. If half the doctors are lousy,
    then obviously something's wrong in the system and changes have to be
    instituted ASAP. However, when /you/ have an inflamed boil on /your/
    butt -- and I suspect a number of you suffer from just that -- then you're
    still going to go see your doc (hopefully one you've come to trust).

    Similarly, helmet studies and statistics can be useful for public policy
    matters -- by MHL proponents and opponents, industry standards to avoid
    unsafe products and meet minimum protection levels, improved venues for
    cyclists if injury trends reveal a chronic problem area, etc. However, the
    /individual/ must (or should be able to) still decide for him- or herself
    what's best for his or her particular circumstances. (Heck, maybe you'd
    rather get your butt boil fixed by a cobbler than a doctor; your choice!)

    Butting back out, Bill S.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.