Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Handlebar stem for better stability; short or long?

Started by Dave Reckoning · · Last activity · 1 post · 453 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 February 2005
Last activity
20 February 2005
Original author
Dave Reckoning
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
453
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Frank Tompson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    However, initially the steering was really wobbly. I thought it was just
    me, but eventually discovered the wrong forks had been fitted. Instead of
    a 47mm rake, a 42mm rake fork had been fitted. It was replaced
    immediately.
    With the 47mm rake fork it is more stable (phew!) by a factor of, say,
    50%. (I understand that this goes against conventional logic which I can't
    explain!) However, how do I get to what I regard as real stability like my
    current Trek 7500FX. Ravens are supposed to 'run on rails'.


    Dave sez:
    Hmmm, it would seem to me that a longer rake would provide LESS castor
    action and stability not more. I am confused by this, is it possible it just
    had WAY too much trail and was sloppy as a result? Is it possible it was
    designed for larger wheels than you are running?

    Quoted message said:

    The Raven comes with a number of height sizes, each of which includes a
    'long' and a 'short' version. I opted for a short version because I like a
    fairly upright ride, but now wonder if I would be better off with a long
    version, and with a shorter handlebar stem. So the question is, would a
    shorter stem (with a longer frame) provide more stability? Grateful for
    any thoughts.


    Again Dave blathers on:
    Speaking only from expierence here, I used to ride several bikes 56TT
    and150mm stem. I recently switched to a 60TT and a 110 stem and a 58.5TT and
    120 setm. Bear in mind that a lot of things changed in the frame design but
    I kept the same bars and wheels. Also bear in mind that the chain stays are
    of nearly the exact same length with a slightly longer front.

    The difference is stunning. I am WAY more in control of the machine. It does
    not tend to oversteer like it did and I no longer make the rear wheel jump
    around if I decide to accererate in less than good road conditions. The
    weight distribution is the biggest difference.

    Quoted message said:

    Also, I'm not entirely convinced by the Raven's 26" wheels. Any opinions?


    Again Dave believes you need to read:
    Frank, Can you be more specific about your lace of confidence? I have many
    opinions about many things 🙂 I think you mean are 26" wheels OK. Yes they
    are but they cut down on your tire choices considerabley. Other than that
    they don't really run any harsher or with noticably more resistance. Having
    said you have fewer tire choices you should bear in mind that at least here
    in the US you have more choices of tire outlets. Every Wallmart carries
    these tires.

    Quoted message said:

    Frank Tompson, Bath

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.