This kind of sensational headline is a trademark of this spammer. I can see by the responses that no one loves this guy here either -- he's all over the net with his sensationalism.
I'm not a spammer. I have no commercial interest in any website, nor in driving traffic to any website for commercial purposes.
Correction: YOU ARE A NONCOMMERCIAL SPAMMER. In the same category as the people who post religious messages to newsgroups where they aren't appropriate -- and also to, for example, alt.atheism. And Doc Tavish, whose hobby was posting antisemitic messages on soc.culture.jewish. And the whacko who posts information about "Big Bertha Thing" stuff.
Correction: YOU ARE A NONCOMMERCIAL SPAMMER. In the same category as the people who post religious messages to newsgroups where they aren't appropriate -- and also to, for example, alt.atheism. And Doc Tavish, whose hobby was posting antisemitic messages on soc.culture.jewish. And the whacko who posts information about "Big Bertha Thing" stuff.
Do you assert that I make postings to newsgroups where they are not relevant? Could you provide a link to such a posting?
Also, in what sense is it possible to be both someone posting without personal profit and be a spammer? I certainly don't consider a certain insane cardiologist to be a spammer, despite my extreme distaste for that guy. As far as I know, that guy isn't making any profit off his vandalism of the newsgroups. If anything, I'd think his activities would reduce his income, if any of his patients were aware of those activities.
Also, do you not have any objection to sock-puppets (i.e. phony supporters of disreputable posters)?
Correction: YOU ARE A NONCOMMERCIAL SPAMMER. In the same category as the people who post religious messages to newsgroups where they aren't appropriate -- and also to, for example, alt.atheism. And Doc Tavish, whose hobby was posting antisemitic messages on soc.culture.jewish. And the whacko who posts information about "Big Bertha Thing" stuff.
Please provide a link to an example where I did something like that. I don't recall posting to any religious newsgroups, but it could have occurred due to careless cross-posting to something I was responding to. (Except alt.religion.scientology, where I post from time to time, whole track. :-)
"Dan Goodman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Mark Thorson said:
D. said:
This kind of sensational headline is a trademark of this spammer. I can see by the responses that no one loves this guy here either -- he's all over the net with his sensationalism.
I'm not a spammer. I have no commercial interest in any website, nor in driving traffic to any website for commercial purposes.
Correction: YOU ARE A NONCOMMERCIAL SPAMMER. In the same category as the people who post religious messages to newsgroups where they aren't appropriate -- and also to, for example, alt.atheism. And Doc Tavish, whose hobby was posting antisemitic messages on soc.culture.jewish. And the whacko who posts information about "Big Bertha Thing" stuff.
--
And an ass. You forgot to say that he's an ass. Only an ass would think this is funny.
