"Why are you so damned rude? You are protesting just a wee bit too much."
Because of a long term pattern of assertions offered on this and other topics with little or no foundation in demonstrated research. Perhaps if you were to start such posts by saying, " it seems to me that perhaps" etc. one would not bother. Your opinion is as good as another when little is known about some topic, and maybe even useful. But the bulk of your posts are assertions of fact, or nearly so apparently unquestioned information, when they are clearly not. Opinions are fine, they are the starting point, not the conclusion based on demonstrated knowledge. You got the show wrong about grain and animals, now go in peace.
"Why are you so damned rude? You are protesting just a wee bit too much."
Because of a long term pattern of assertions offered on this and other topics with little or no foundation in demonstrated research. Perhaps if you were to start such posts by saying, " it seems to me that perhaps" etc. one would not bother. Your opinion is as good as another when little is known about some topic, and maybe even useful. But the bulk of your posts are assertions of fact, or nearly so apparently unquestioned information, when they are clearly not. Opinions are fine, they are the starting point, not the conclusion based on demonstrated knowledge. You got the show wrong about grain and animals, now go in peace.
Mucho reassertion not supported snipped
These "assertions" were simply my statements repeating what was said in the program. You got a problem with it, contact the guy making the assertions in the program. You've got the link to PBS.
