Steve, do you believe that the site that does little else but print papers from refereed journals can somehow skew opinions because they're funded from one lobby or another?
Not mine.
Quoted message said:
If that's so you must have a low opinion of all of those Safe Kids and Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute and that sort of site.
You'll not get me into a helmet thread that easily.
Quoted message said:
By the way - what do you suppose it means when the IPCC prints their conclusions on global warming and then holds up the "proof" while having the papers modified TO REFLECT THE CONCLUSIONS?
"Mark & Steven Bornfeld" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:qqUdi.2855$Zh6.2366@trnddc04...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Steve, do you believe that the site that does little else but print papers from refereed journals can somehow skew opinions because they're funded from one lobby or another?
Not mine.
Quoted message said:
If that's so you must have a low opinion of all of those Safe Kids and Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute and that sort of site.
You'll not get me into a helmet thread that easily.
Quoted message said:
By the way - what do you suppose it means when the IPCC prints their conclusions on global warming and then holds up the "proof" while having the papers modified TO REFLECT THE CONCLUSIONS?
This isn't about the IPCC.
Far's I can make up you seem to believe that those being maligned by the IPCC shouldn't have any voice at all and if they dare speak up then you're going to claim that it's all lies because they have a horse in the race.
