General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: gi vs. gl

Started by Cubit · · Last activity · 1 post · 336 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
14 September 2005
Last activity
14 September 2005
Original author
Cubit
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
336
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I feel GI is useless, since it does not take quantity into account. GL is
    the way to go, but if you look at it, they make assumptions on quantity to
    determine a GL. Thus, even using GL numbers, the actual quantity is going
    to change the actual load. IMHO: The bottom line is that if the total net
    carbs are low, then the effective GL is low.

    I just count net carbs, and I don't worry about the rest....

    "Stinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi, I have a question about the glycemic index and load. I have
    purchased the book "Glycemic Revolution" and have read most of it, but
    I am confused about what to use -- the GI or GL.

    At first the GI seemed the easiest to use, but then I read about how
    even if a food has a high GI, if it has low carb count, then it has a
    small impact on our insulin levels.

    Therefore, to me, the GL seems to be the way to go. Now, am I supposed
    to choose low GL foods with moderate-to-high carbohydrate count (and a
    low GI), or a food that has low carbs and a low GL?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.