"john" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Flu in Denver, Year 2003
by Jim West
Beginning late November, 2003, flu epidemics became media headlines,
possibly because new vaccine products such as FluMist hit the market,
giving press agents something to promote.
Actually, stories about the flu hit the air every year. THis year, the flu
is particularly early.
Quoted message said:Some scientists and officials
stated that there was no epidemiological evidence that the flu was any
worse than the previous year.This short list of flu research should be helpful in understanding this
disease paradigm. You will find a BINGO herein, found in the Colorado flu
epidemics. Those flu epidemics correlate day-to-day with winter air
pollution, thought to be due to atmospheric inversions.
So why weren't there flu epidemics in the summer?
Quoted message said:Causation: Stress
Wrong. Virus.
Quoted message said:Surely the stress, such as cold weather and social factors (depression,
loss) bring about flu symptoms, especially lung stress difficulties. The
chessmaster, Boris Spasky suffered a lengthy bout of flu after losing to
Bobby Fischer. Similarly, social loss brings about the same symptoms.
Causative stress for flu, I posit, is often due to the sum total stress
burden: emotional, social, innate, internally absorbed pharmaceutical
poisons, and externally absorbed industrial poisons -- not a virus.
In other words you have no clue. As usual.
Quoted message said:Flu Virus: Characteristics
The media is solely concerned with virology.
No. The media is concerned with reporting news stories. And they try to get
it accurate.
Quoted message said:The flu "virus" evolves and
changes form rapidly; thus vaccines have been described as not
efficacious.
Actually, for some of the virus strains going around, the flu vaccine is
effective. For one of the strains, it is not so effective.
Quoted message said:The entire flu paradigm may be invalid since there is no reason to believe
that flu virology is any better than the highly funded HIV "science" (see
www.virusmyth.com).
Other than the fact that people who got the vaccine in earlier years had
much less illness and death from the flu. And the fact that the anitgens in
previous years covered at least 95% of the viruses going around.
Quoted message said:My experience (see items 1,2,3 below) finds that
virology is such sloppy science that anymore, I feel foolish studying it,
as if it exists only as a diversion. So I'll leave an in-depth study of
flu virology for later.Environmental Toxicology
1) West Nile virus disease is a "Flu-like illness", evidently air
poisoning: www.geocities.com/noxot
This shows how little you understand medicine. "Flu-like illness" is a
discription of the symptoms, not a suggestion at all of what the cause is.
Quoted message said:2) Polio symptoms include flu symptoms, evidently pesticide poisoning:
www.geocities.com/harpub
Ditto.
Quoted message said:3) SARS is "flu-like", evidently air poisoning:
www.westonaprice.org/envtoxins/sarsepidemic.html
Ditto.
Quoted message said:4) Chemical bottle labels often warn of symptoms of over-exposure, in
terms
Quoted message said:of "flu-like illness."
Ditto.
Quoted message said:Colorado, Winter 2003
This year, 2003, Colorado seems to be getting the most news re flu
epidemics. Several children have died, among over 6,000 stricken to date
(12/14/2003). These epidemics correlate perfectly with air pollution.
Here
Quoted message said:is a description of winter pollution:
Please explain why the kids who are sick are positive for influenza while
those who are not are not positive for inlfuenza by the diagnostic tests.
Jeff
(Rest of garbage deleted -- I am eating breakfast and don't want to toss
what I ate already.)