Quoted message said:Subject: Re: FAO: DRCEE PHD
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 5/20/04 11:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
My original thought for my life was to develop medicines that would benefit
millions of humans rather than to be a doctor who could only benefit mere
thousands.
I now realize that this thought is as false as modern medicine's cures.
Quoted message said:I was thinking of actuallty getting myself a decent darkfield and seeing if
I could see these things under it.
As I understand it, darkfield only means that you view your objective by
incident lighting. That is, rather than shine the light through the material
to be viewed, you shine your illumination source on the object and view the
relfected light.
Rife went one step further. He irrated the material with particular light
which caused the material to "glow" and produce its own light. UV, both long
and short, would probably be the choice energy source. This gives rise to
flouresence and is widely used in chromatography.
What I do not yet understand is what light source did Bechamp use? How many
hours did he labor viewing living slides and not dead, stained slides?
This is paramount to understanding his research. If we cannot reproduce his
results, then we cannot really comment upon or even begin to understand what he
saw, understood, and proposed.
Quoted message said:Of course they are expensive so I will have to do a bit of saving up.
Unfortunately, I am in the same boat.
Great desires, real zeal, but few bucks.
Quoted message said:Note that Rife quotes that the organisms are seen as dried up blobs under an
electron, which is what you see here.
Rife was correct. I think Bechamp was also.
Quoted message said:If you want to give me a hand with this and what Bechamp did then that would
be nice.
I have you in mind as we read.
Have a great and healthy day!!!
DrC PhD