UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Energy losses in chain drive?

Started by Tony B · · Last activity · 2 posts · 338 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
26 November 2006
Last activity
27 November 2006
Original author
Tony B
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
338
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    There could well be more resistance in the new transmission because the
    bearing surfaces have not bedded in.

    I once had a CBR600 that recorded 82bhp at the back wheel on a dyno, it
    then put down 86bhp immediately after having new chain and sprockets
    fitted. Efficiency of a new chain drive is often reported at 98% or more
    but old knackered drives are way, way below this.

    Here's a decent link:

    http://www.sdearthtimes.com/et1199/et1199s13.html

    hth,

    Tony B

  2. Tony B said:


    Here's a decent link:

    http://www.sdearthtimes.com/et1199/et1199s13.html

    Interesting about the big sprockets being more efficient because the
    chain bends less.
    So those compact chainrings on MTBs are harder work. Apart from a bit
    more weight it implies that scaling up front and rear cogs would be an
    improvement.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.