General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Effective liver cleanse?

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 2 posts · 338 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 July 2003
Last activity
20 July 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
338
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Effective liver cleanse?
    From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/19/2003 4:20 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Effective liver cleanse?
    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
    Date: 7/18/2003 8:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Singingfem <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >Searching for a good liver/gall bladder cleanse. Any recs?

    Yeah -- don't bother.

    That is strictly David's opinion, and as usual, a denial from the


    debunkers.

    It happens to be the opinion of anyone who has had anything to do with real
    gallstones, as the enquirer will readily find out if he looks.

    Strictly *your* opinion.

    You have a bad recording of looking.

    Quoted message said:

    Supporting this makes you look foolish, JAn. Your credibiltiy is tenous
    enough.

    Peter Moran

    You need to worry about YOUR credibility.

    And your being about to see.

    And then stop lying.

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/809196.asp

    Peter Moran wrote:

    All medical advances have entailed risk, ever since the first caveman said"I
    wonder what this berry does?".

    Using retroviruses to try and correct lethal and potentially lethal gene
    defects is a very legitimate and logic alavenue of medical research. So this is
    nothing to do with "conspiracies", "coverups" .

    It is a matter of the quality of informed consent that was applied. It would
    be unusual these days for such issues to not be addressed carefully by the
    researchers and the ethics committees to which all clinical trials are
    submitted thesedays. We cannot know how culpable the doctors are from this
    rather emotive news item.

    Peter Moran
    ==============================

    Years earlier, a scientist just a few miles away from the Gelsinger’s home in
    Tucson had raised serious questions about whether the experiment was safe.

    Documents

    • Feb. 8, 2002: FDA letter, attempt to ban Dr. Wilson from other
    experiments.
    • March 3, 2000: FDA Warning Letter, original findings about the gene
    therapy experiment.

    (No coverups there,,,,,,,,,,,,,)

    The trouble is, Paul Gelsinger says, Dr. Wilson’s team had never told him
    that anyone had ever raised questions about safety

    (That's fine and dandy according to organized medicine member, Peter Moran.)

    ADVERSE REACTIONS WERE NOT REPORTED
    And that was just the beginning. Federal investigators, pouring through
    Penn’s records, announced at the conference that they had made a series of
    startling discoveries, raising questions about whether the doctors had covered
    up problems and broken basic test rules.

    In fact, just a few months before Jesse had signed up for the experiment,
    several monkeys given viruses similar to Jesse’s got sick. And two of them
    died.

    (No coverup there)

    The rules for the experiment said: Even if volunteers didn’t get visibly ill,
    if tests showed that any of them had a significant reaction called “grade
    3,” the experiment was supposed to be “halted” immediately.
    Records show there were “grade 3” reactions in more than one
    patient. The first time, doctors stopped, called the government and got
    permission to continue, saying an unusual condition with the patient might have
    been the cause.
    The second time, they stopped, called and got permission again, citing
    another unusual condition.
    But when it happened a third time, they didn’t stop, didn’t call.
    Then, a fourth time. They didn’t stop or call then either

    (No coverups there).

    For their own safety, volunteers weren’t supposed to have a blood
    ammonia level higher than 50. But people were coming in with higher levels and
    without proper approval. The limit was raised to 70.
    When Jesse signed up over the summer, he was within the limits, but
    records show that when Penn doctors tested him, just days before the
    experiment, his reading was 114 — more than double the original safety limit.

    (That's way cool huh Peter???)

    HIGH FINANCIAL STAKES
    With so many red flags from the monkey deaths to the reactions in other
    volunteers, even to Jesse’s own ammonia levels, Why had Dr. Wilson’s team
    allowed the experiment to continue?

    (Wonder if Peter can answer this question?)

    At the University of Pennsylvania, the conflict committee approved Dr.
    Wilson’s arrangement with Genovo.
    In fact, the university itself owned a piece of his company and stood to
    profit, too.

    (Hmmmmmmmmm).

    In a statement, the university acknowledged that some information
    “should have been shared with the FDA sooner.”

    (Just a minor little slip,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)

    There was no information given to Jesse or his family about the monkey deaths.
    There was no information given to Jesse or his family about toxic results in
    prior patients. There was no information that would allow Jesse and his family
    to make any kind of informed decision.”

    (Peter STILL can't see any coverup!!!! NO dishonesty!)

    CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS

    He told congress that other private companies in the race for cures had
    also been doing gene therapy experiments and had also gotten adverse reactions.
    But instead of sharing the information, government rules allowed them to stamp
    those reactions “confidential,” classifying them as trade secrets to
    protect their research investments.
    So, while the government knew about them, other researchers like Dr.
    Wilson and volunteers like Jesse Gelsinger were never allowed to see them.

    (TRust the government!!!)

    “I was outraged,” says Paul. “I had a right to know. Jesse had a right to
    know.

    (Oh my,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,emotions).

    In February, the Food and Drug Administration said that because Dr. Wilson
    filed “false and misleading” reports and “repeatedly and deliberately
    violated regulations

    REPEAT FOR THE HARD HEADED!!!

    Dr. Wilson filed “false and misleading” reports and “repeatedly and
    deliberately violated regulations

    (No coverups,,,,,,,,,,no fraud,,,,,,,,,,no deliberate violations,,,,,,,,,,,,)

    This week marks the third anniversary of Jesse Gelsinger’s death. At
    the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Wilson

    ****is still on the faculty****

    (Soooooooooo in organized medicine,,,,,,,,,,,)

    ****Filing *false and misleading reports* is A OK,,,,,,,,,,,,****

    ****REPEATED and DELIBERATE violations,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,is A OK.***

    but no longer in charge of its gene therapy program. And, in Congress,
    lawmakers are still debating legislation to provide more protection for medical
    volunteers.

    ******in the end, whether Jesse was betrayed by the doctors he and his family
    thought they could trust.*********

  2. --

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    $ KaChing & KaChing $5 for Peter --Rich

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.