General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Effective diet to reduce cardiovascular disease

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 234 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 December 2004
Last activity
19 December 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
234
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "There are (so far) neither many comments nor many participants in this
    thread. However, we will rectify that with more crossposting :-)"

    Oh Andrew, please do say you are not one of those trolley things. Isn't
    that what they call those people who go about doing mischief on the
    internet by pushing themselves where not welcome? "Ding, ding goes the
    trolley, did you watch Mr. Rodgers when you were young and his trolley
    bits where the trolley went in endless circles. Don't dispair, the therad
    is young and many will no doubt want to contribute. This diet would be an
    excellent part of the revision to your dietary suggesttions, and it
    addresses some more goals of health and nutrition that your perscriptive
    observations did not reveal. Others have now led you to revise that first
    observation and I can just about hear the gears turning now after you have
    seen the article in this thread.

    "No. But I am laughing at you :-)"

    Good, we all have a role to play in enriching the lives of those around
    us, laughter is the best medicine, do you know the origin of that phrase?
    ..

  2. Quoted message said:


    "There are (so far) neither many comments nor many participants in this
    thread. However, we will rectify that with more crossposting :-)"

    Oh Andrew, please do say you are not one of those trolley things. Isn't
    that what they call those people who go about doing mischief on the
    internet by pushing themselves where not welcome? "Ding, ding goes the
    trolley, did you watch Mr. Rodgers when you were young and his trolley
    bits where the trolley went in endless circles. Don't dispair, the therad
    is young and many will no doubt want to contribute. This diet would be an
    excellent part of the revision to your dietary suggesttions, and it
    addresses some more goals of health and nutrition that your perscriptive
    observations did not reveal. Others have now led you to revise that first
    observation and I can just about hear the gears turning now after you have
    seen the article in this thread.

    "No. But I am laughing at you :-)"

    Good, we all have a role to play in enriching the lives of those around
    us, laughter is the best medicine, do you know the origin of that phrase?

    No, but you remain amusing.

    Hope my response enlightens you.

    Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
    (http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    http://www.heartmdphd.com/

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

    What is all this about?
    http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A

    Is this spam?
    http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9

  3. "No, but you remain amusing."

    Glad I can provide emotional nourishment for you. The task before us will
    not be easy and half measures even in the area of humor will help no one.

    Getting back to revising the 2 lb diet, let's review. 1. it has flaws. 2.
    it doesn't fit calories a person needs to lose and keep a certain weight
    by just throwing everyone into the same pot and provides no good way to
    know what food to choose to make this happen. 3. it ignores health goals
    which are important when thinking about which foods to include 4. it
    ignores nutrition goals which are also important for choosing foods for
    the diet.

    I think someone could go to a fast food place and eat 2 lbs only and flunk
    in all of the flaw areas but still seem to be doing ok because it is only
    2 lbs. You have suggested some changes in the health area to fix it
    because you know something about that kind of thing. The other areas are
    not your strong areas because your training in human energetics and
    nutrition are only given very short mention in medical training. That's
    where we are asking for the input of other people to help revise the 2 lb
    diet.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.