Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Re: Ed Dolan on Ed Dolan

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 5 posts · 442 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
10 March 2006
Last activity
12 March 2006
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
442
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    For those of you have yet to visit this link, do so ...
    http://www.ed.dolan.youaremighty.com

    I have submitted for your enjoyment my take on Ed Dolan.....


    [...]

    Blah, blah, blah ...

    My only question is why are these posts only appearing on RBM when all the
    world knows that the Great Ed Dolan is to be found mainly on ARBR. It is a
    pain in the ass to have to come over to RBM when all the world knows it is
    full of nothing but idiots, morons and imbeciles. For Christ's sakes, if the
    post refers to me, then make g.d. sure it gets posted to ARBR. How difficult
    can that be?

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  2. Ed,

    Because this stuff was in both places in the first place, that's why
    .... dullard. Let me see if I have this right. You are objecting to
    your "GREATNESS" not being confined to a single newsgroup? That's odd.
    I thought you'd relish the opportunity to spread and contaminate other
    newsgroups with your [censored].

    Jim McNamara

  3. "JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ed,

    Because this stuff was in both places in the first place, that's why
    ... dullard. Let me see if I have this right. You are objecting to
    your "GREATNESS" not being confined to a single newsgroup? That's odd.
    I thought you'd relish the opportunity to spread and contaminate other
    newsgroups with your [censored].

    I know who are the regular members of each newsgroup, so when a thread
    concerns me and there are messages being posted from members of both groups,
    then that thread should appear on both newsgroups. Who the hell are you to
    pick and choose which newsgroups to post to when the thread is all about me
    and is ongoing, especially in light of the fact that you never have anything
    interesting to say anyway. Is this rocket science or what?

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  4. Ed,

    Then you must also know that you are one of the irregular (read
    atypical) members . I think I've struck a nerve. Yeah Ed, it's always
    about you isn't it? Are you just a litle eogcentirc? Dunderhead, I
    didn't pick and choose. I merely responded to already cross-posted
    threads, a concept that is so elementary and yet managed to elude your
    poor powers of perception. As concerns the assertion that I never have
    anything interesting to say, I refer you to the following link ...

    groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/browse_frm/thread/b0477afabe6c9e34/848f50b7a2713a8e?q=speed&rnum=2#848f50b7a2713a8e.

    Oh that's right. You don't do links. Well then, allow me to help you
    out with that one. In response to a recent post of mine, you wrote...

    Mr. McNamara has posted a veritable feast of a message, something that
    Mr.
    Sherman I would never think to do. We are primarily responders, but
    there
    is a lot to respond to here if we so wish. But it is good to read
    something
    from a fellow member of ARBR who sums up a lot of what we are all about
    on
    this group.

    See what I mean about you being contradictory and a conundrum? Now you
    lied in one of these posts. Care to pick one? Everybody sing along
    with ... Killing him softly with his words. This is just too easy and
    to think Ed believes that he has no equal. He is so imperceptive that
    he doesn't even realize that he's not in the same league as some who
    post here.

    Jim McNamara

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ed,

    Then you must also know that you are one of the irregular (read
    atypical) members . I think I've struck a nerve. Yeah Ed, it's always
    about you isn't it? Are you just a litle eogcentirc? Dunderhead, I
    didn't pick and choose. I merely responded to already cross-posted
    threads, a concept that is so elementary and yet managed to elude your
    poor powers of perception. ...

    Others will often trim the newsgroups. I do that myself many times. But when
    a thread is about me and others are trimming ARBR, it is because they fear a
    response from the Great One. The coward Tom Keats does this sort of thing
    all the time. If you are saying something about me, make sure it gets to
    ARBR no matter the other newsgroups. Frankly, RBM is hardly worth going to
    it is just so full of idiots, morons and imbeciles. But the absolute nadir
    of all the cycling newsgroups is that freaking racing one, RBR. It is
    strictly for juveniles.

    As concerns the assertion that I never have

    Quoted message said:

    anything interesting to say, I refer you to the following link ...

    groups.google.com/group/alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent/browse_frm/thread/b0477afabe6c9e34/848f50b7a2713a8e?q=speed&rnum=2#848f50b7a2713a8e.

    Oh that's right. You don't do links. Well then, allow me to help you
    out with that one. In response to a recent post of mine, you wrote...

    Mr. McNamara has posted a veritable feast of a message, something that
    Mr.
    Sherman and I would never think to do. We are primarily responders, but
    there
    is a lot to respond to here if we so wish. But it is good to read
    something
    from a fellow member of ARBR who sums up a lot of what we are all about
    on
    this group.

    See what I mean about you being contradictory and a conundrum? Now you
    lied in one of these posts. Care to pick one? Everybody sing along
    with ... Killing him softly with his words. This is just too easy and
    to think Ed believes that he has no equal. He is so imperceptive that
    he doesn't even realize that he's not in the same league as some who
    post here.

    Every post with me is sui generis. I do not go back and resurrect messages
    from months ago or even weeks ago. If you are going to post to ARBR, you had
    better stay tuned permanently. I am too Great to be bothered by what I might
    have said a few weeks ago. You need to be on ARBR on a daily basis if you
    are going to be au currant. Anything less is beneath me.

    Mr. Sherman was a pretty good antagonist for me in the good old days when we
    were arguing politics, but he has vacated that field and now just posts bits
    and pieces of nonsense. He has become a mere quipper. But other than Tom
    Sherman, there was only Freewheeling (Scott) whom I ever considered my
    equal.

    If and when you ever find your true voice, you will be a worthy wall for me
    to bounce my ideas off, but you must abandon that wordy gibberish that you
    like so much. It just rings too false. Also, you must learn to bottom post.
    Otherwise, we are never going to get anywhere.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.