Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Doping due process, Pat (and [censored])!

Started by cycledogg · · Last activity · 2 posts · 445 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
5 October 2006
Last activity
5 October 2006
Original author
cycledogg
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
445
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Could somebody tell me what significant evidence McQuaid has on Ullrich
    to keep him from getting a license and allow Basso to continue to ride?
    I don't see anyone of these two riders more guilty than the other.
    Rick in Tennessee

  2. "cycledogg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Could somebody tell me what significant evidence McQuaid has on Ullrich
    to keep him from getting a license and allow Basso to continue to ride?
    I don't see anyone of these two riders more guilty than the other.
    Rick in Tennessee

    He has made similar statements about Basso

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.