"DiscoDuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Colin B. said:
I would rather wear a helmet and have no head injury than not wear
one
Quoted message said:
and have even a "minor" head injury. Mind you, I value my head and
its
Quoted message said:
contents.
As for your claim that "none of us know of anyone with a serious head
Quoted message said:
injury PRIOR to the law", you know that your claim is complete BS. I know of at least one person who has had a steal plate in his skull
for
Quoted message said:
over thirty years as a result of a cycling accident. As well, I know people who have died who were not wearing helmets. Therefore, your claim is false.
Let's see, what are the odds that you would know that many people who have suffered a head injury during cycling? EXTREMELY low (almost immeasurable).
What are the chances you are telling falsehood? Very high as displayed by proponents of the law, over and over. They all seem to have claim to a "brush with death" or know legions of people who ARE dead or seriously head injured. LOL
It appears you want to force people to wear a helmet whether they want to or not, forcing your will upon others. This is the primary reason for this law-ego not facts or concern.
Surely everyone on BC has got to know that DiscoDuck is nothing but a blooming idiot. He tried to post his [censored] on ARBR, but I made short work of him and reduced him to the blithering idiot that he is. He ended up just calling me names, which is all he is good for. If you listen to this supreme jerk, you will most likely end up dead. Fools like him are to found on every newsgroup, but he seems to monopolize this particular subject of whether to wear a helmet or not. From this I conclude that he is a maniac. Steer clear of him if you value your life.
Surely everyone on BC has got to know that DiscoDuck is nothing but a
Quoted message said:
blooming idiot. He tried to post his [censored] on ARBR, but I made short
work of
Quoted message said:
him and reduced him to the blithering idiot that he is. He ended up
just
Quoted message said:
calling me names, which is all he is good for. If you listen to this
supreme
Quoted message said:
jerk, you will most likely end up dead. Fools like him are to found
on every
Quoted message said:
newsgroup, but he seems to monopolize this particular subject of
whether to
Quoted message said:
wear a helmet or not. From this I conclude that he is a maniac. Steer
clear
Quoted message said:
of him if you value your life.
What a liar: LOL. Name calling and in the same breath calling me a jerk? Irony at its best. Poor guy eddy boy is. This is his full time job-pursuing me online. He seems to be greatly attracted to me and my posts. I am flattered and pleased I can help him learn the error of his ways (even though he won't admit it). I encourage any reader to look him posts by Eddy boy and see where the name calling comes from.
Yes I am a maniac becasue I want people to have the choice whereas Eddy boy wants to impose his will on you all (like the other nazis).
YOu love me soo much, why deny it? I'm sorry eddy but I am not gay....
You should check with Perry Butler to determine if you are homosexual or not - he has the ability to determine this entirely from Usenet postings. [End sarcasm]
Quoted message said:
But I hope you find someone who can love you the same you deserve. Perhaps a dog?
"...In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be...." - Senator Rick Santorum, Republican-Pennsylvania
