"Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:...
Quoted message said:
"Larry Varney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Nope, too late Varney. We have all seen pictures of you with young girls
that you posted yourself on BROL. There you are big as life hiding
behind your scruffy white beard, looking like an evil Santa Claus,
surrounded by innocent young girls. It sent shivers up and down my
spine. You should be ashamed of yourself - a man your age!And you are at it again, Dolan: spouting lies that are easily proven to
be just that. There are NO pictures of me, on BROL or elsewhere, with
young girls. Surrounded or singly, they aren't there. Period. You are a
liar, Dolan.Not unless you have deleted them. I think it was in connection with a tour
you were doing. You are the old white bearded guy with several young gals
around you. You are looking very happy and contented, but I cannot imagine
what about as those gals were obviously just humoring an old coot his
fancies. Damn! I wish I had saved that photo to My Documents but I was too
repelled by it to even think of saving it. But I ask you, am I likely to
make up something like this?
[...]Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>I don't know which is worse, being lectured by a liberal on moral
>>issues or discussing politics with them. I think of the two, I prefer
>>the political discussions as I do not like lectures by degenerates who
>>do not have a clue about any kind of morality, individual or public. It
>>is the equivalent of the Devil trying to teach morality to God.
>
> You differentiate between "individual" and "public" morality? Is this
> some religion of your own? Or are you going to show us a new version of
> the Ten Commandments, perhaps, with asterisks denoting which are for
> "public" morality, and which are for "individual"?There is a huge difference between individual morality and public
morality, but I am too tired and weary to explain it to you. Go educate
yourself - you numskull!Of course there's a "huge differene" between individual and public
morality. It's called "situational ethics" by some, and a "double
standard" by others. Go ahead, Dolan, explain to us how something can be
moral individually but not publicly, or vice-versa.I was thinking of liberals who are actually quite moral in their
individual personal lives but are quite immoral in their public lives as
indicated by how they vote and think about public matters. Those who make
excuses for Muslim terrorists and Palestinian suicide bombers for
instance. Those who think France is OK even though they betrayed the West
by standing by Sadaam and thereby in effect causing a war that could have
been avoided if they had sided with us in the first instance. The list
just goes on and on. Again, these liberal enablelers of evil may be moral
in their individual lives, but they are highly immoral in their public
lives.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Of course, I keep forgetting: you are the God of your own religion, the
religion of the bigot, the liar, the crude and the vulgar. Of course you
would have multiple, separate moralities. It's so convenient! And you
replaced all of the commandments of other relgions, with just one:
Sui Generis. Right, Dolan?
Please, enough flattery in one post. You are starting to embarrass me. Just
admire me; you do not have to worship me. I am a secularist, not a
religionist.
--
Regards,
Ed Dolan the All Wise and All Knowing - Minnesota