General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: CrossFit

Started by Hobbes · · Last activity · 3 posts · 371 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 December 2005
Last activity
24 December 2005
Original author
Hobbes
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
371
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    What I've read about crossfit (at crossfit.com and other places)
    doesn't match up at all with a Dec 22 NYT article about it called
    "Getting Fit, Even if It Kills You."

    The author, Stephanie Cooperman, claims that crossfit doesn't
    emphasize technique and that crossfit enthusiasts don't care whether
    they get injured.

    I'd like to know Ms. Cooperman's credentials on the subject of
    physical fitness.

    I suspect that many gym owners, trainers, and members would find
    crossfit intimidating.

    Of course, there's always the possibility of running into nutty
    trainers or lifters anywhere.

    [snip article]

    Anyone can overreach by trying to do too much too soon. I don't think
    you can fault the program. Perhaps it would be prudent to put a
    disclaimer on the site that gradual progression and learning technique
    are advised.

    But the article was simply a media person spinning a story. The idea
    that it dangerous to lift a kettlebell overhead or do swings is
    ludicrous, but she calls it a 44 lb steel ball and makes it sound
    dangerous.

    Sensationalism. Whatever happened to objective journalists?

    --
    Keith

  2. "Hobbes" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    Whatever happened to objective journalists?


    Objective journalists Keith??

    That is what is referred to as an oxymoron.

  3. Hobbes said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    What I've read about crossfit (at crossfit.com and other places)
    doesn't match up at all with a Dec 22 NYT article about it called
    "Getting Fit, Even if It Kills You."

    The author, Stephanie Cooperman, claims that crossfit doesn't
    emphasize technique and that crossfit enthusiasts don't care whether
    they get injured.

    I'd like to know Ms. Cooperman's credentials on the subject of
    physical fitness.

    I suspect that many gym owners, trainers, and members would find
    crossfit intimidating.

    Of course, there's always the possibility of running into nutty
    trainers or lifters anywhere.

    [snip article]

    Anyone can overreach by trying to do too much too soon. I don't think
    you can fault the program. Perhaps it would be prudent to put a
    disclaimer on the site that gradual progression and learning technique
    are advised.

    But the article was simply a media person spinning a story. The idea
    that it dangerous to lift a kettlebell overhead or do swings is
    ludicrous, but she calls it a 44 lb steel ball and makes it sound
    dangerous.

    Sensationalism. Whatever happened to objective journalists?

    The coalition of the willing has them in secret CIA detention camps.
    It's just as bad in Australia and the UK. Makes me very agitated when I
    hear these morons crapping on about things they don't understand (which
    is just about everything).

    Ari

    --
    spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply

    I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
    neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
    hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
    marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
    transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
    http://www.abmdr.org.au/
    http://www.marrow.org/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.