General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Contaminates in Salmon

Started by John Sankey · · Last activity · 3 posts · 532 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 August 2005
Last activity
19 August 2005
Original author
John Sankey
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
532
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I certainly wouldn't quit eating Alaskan salmon on the basis of a
    news report of a study thousands of miles south that omits all
    numbers. I've asked the author to let me know a few essential
    details (hopefully I'll get a preprint) and follow up. As far as
    I'm concerned, Alaska pink salmon is one of the healthiest
    sustainable foods we can get these days.

  2. Source: American Chemical Society

    Date: 2005-08-09

    Grizzlies And Salmon: Too Much Of A Good Thing?

    Even grizzly bears should watch what they eat. It turns out that
    grizzlies that gorge themselves on salmon during the summer spawning
    season have much higher levels of contaminants in their bodies than
    their cousins who rely more on berries, plants and insects, according
    to Peter Ross of Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

    Reporting in an article to be published Sept. 15 in the American
    Chemical Society journal, Environmental Science & Technology, Canadian
    researchers say the difference in the concentration of persistent
    organic pollutants (POPs) is "profound" between grizzly bears who
    eat lots of salmon and those that don't. The measurements were made
    by examining hair and fat samples from two groups of grizzly bears in
    the British Columbia region of Canada. One group included bears that
    had a steady diet of terrestrial foods, the other group included bears
    that shifted to marine food when the salmon returned from the Pacific
    Ocean to spawn.

    Although the overall contaminant concentrations in the grizzlies are
    lower than many other species of animals that consume marine food, the
    researchers - from Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the
    University of Victoria and Raincoast Conversation Society - say the
    reproductive window of the bears could be vulnerable to health impacts.

    Editor's Note: The original news release can be found here.
    http://acswebapplications.acs.org/applications/ccs/application/index.cfm?PressReleaseID=2515&categoryid=4

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This story has been adapted from a news release issued by American
    Chemical Society.

    John Sankey said:

    I certainly wouldn't quit eating Alaskan salmon on the basis of a
    news report of a study thousands of miles south that omits all
    numbers. I've asked the author to let me know a few essential
    details (hopefully I'll get a preprint) and follow up. As far as
    I'm concerned, Alaska pink salmon is one of the healthiest
    sustainable foods we can get these days.

  3. "John Sankey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I certainly wouldn't quit eating Alaskan salmon on the basis of a
    news report of a study thousands of miles south that omits all
    numbers. I've asked the author to let me know a few essential
    details (hopefully I'll get a preprint) and follow up. As far as
    I'm concerned, Alaska pink salmon is one of the healthiest
    sustainable foods we can get these days.

    Yes, possibly. But beware of farmed salmon
    and Atlantic salmon.

    http://www.oceansalive.org/eat.cfm?subnav=bestandworst

    GWC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.