General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Connecticut Approves Ritalin Law

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 1 post · 212 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 September 2003
Last activity
26 September 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
212
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.tommyjones.org/allaboutdrugs/rit/ConApprovesRitLaw7_01.html

    Tuesday, July 17, 2001
    Connecticut Approves Ritalin Law

    HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - When Sheila Matthews' son was in first grade, a school
    psychologist diagnosed him with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and
    gave his parents information on Ritalin.

    Matthews refused to put him on the drug. She believed the boy was energetic and
    outgoing but not disruptive, and she suspected the school system was trying to
    medicate him just to make it easier for the teachers.

    Now the state of Connecticut has weighed in on the side of parents like
    Matthews with a first-in-the-nation law that reflects a growing backlash
    against what some see as overuse of Ritalin and other behavioral drugs.

    The law - approved unanimously by the Legislature and signed by Gov. John G.
    Rowland - prohibits teachers, counselors and other school officials from
    recommending psychiatric drugs for any child.

    The measure does not prevent school officials from recommending that a child be
    evaluated by a medical doctor. But the law is intended to make sure the first
    mention of drugs for a behavior or learning problem comes from a doctor.

    The chief sponsor, state Rep. Lenny Winkler, is an emergency room nurse. ``I
    cannot believe how many young kids are on Prozac, Thorazine, Haldol - you name
    it,'' Winkler said. ``It blows my mind.''

    While she has no problem with the use of Ritalin under a doctor's care, Winkler
    said a teacher's recommendation is often enough to persuade parents to seek
    drug treatment for their child's behavior problems.

    ``It's easier to give somebody a pill than to get to the bottom of the
    problem,'' she said.

    Nationally, nearly 20 million prescriptions for Ritalin, Adderall and other
    stimulants used to treat ADHD were written last year - a 35 percent increase
    over 1996, according to IMS Health, a health care information company. Most of
    those prescriptions were for boys under 12, IMS Health said.

    In some elementary and middle schools, as many as 6 percent of all students
    take Ritalin or other psychiatric drugs, according to the federal Drug
    Enforcement Administration.

    Dr. Andres Martin, a child psychiatrist at the Yale University Child Study
    Center, said schools have no business practicing psychiatry.

    ``We've all heard these horror stories of parents who are told, `If you don't
    medicate your child, he can't be in the classroom,''' he said. ``You never hear
    the school say, `If you don't take the damn appendix out, this kid has a bad
    outcome.' You say, `Your kid has a stomach ache. Take him to the doctor.'''

    The Connecticut Association of Boards of Education has taken no position on the
    bill. Nor has the Connecticut Education Association, the state's largest
    teachers union. But union President Rosemary Coyle said the she believes the
    problem is overstated.

    ``I really believe teachers do not practice medicine,'' Coyle said. ``We don't
    recommend kids get on drugs.''

    Concern about Ritalin and other drugs is widespread. The Texas Board of
    Education adopted a resolution last year recommending that schools consider
    non-medical solutions to behavior problems. The Colorado school board approved
    a similar resolution in 1999, and legislation regarding psychiatric drugs in
    school has been proposed in nearly a dozen states.

    In the New Canaan school district, Matthews and her husband took their son, now
    8, to a private psychologist, who said the boy has trouble with reasoning. He
    now receives special education from the school system.

    ``I was able to get, for $2,000, a different label that has an educational
    connotation, rather than medical,'' said Matthews, who did not want her son's
    name used.

    New Canaan district officials did not return repeated calls for comment. But
    Matthews said she has resolved many of her differences with the school system,
    which did not threaten to remove her son from class.

    ``I'm really thrilled'' about the new law, she said, ``because it gives parents
    an awareness that there should be a clear difference between education and
    medication. Our schools are now getting into the field of mental health. That's
    not what we send our children to school for.''

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.