Quoted message said:Subject: Re: Another use for Ritalin
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 12/20/2003 12:17 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>In article <[email hidden]>,
Marciosos7 Probertiosos8 said:
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:>From: nknisley [email hidden]
>Date: 12/19/2003 4:11 PM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]><snip>
>IIRC, a few months back, I had an exchange of posts with Jan on the
>subject of ER visits for methylphenidate abuse after she posted a claim
>that ER admissions for methylphenidate abuse was growing at an alarming
>rate.>As I told Jan then, the US federal government tracks US "ED mentions"
>through DAWN (Drug Abuse Warning Network). http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/
>>I gave Jan some of the info taken from the DAWN reports that indicated
>that methylphenidate abuse was declining, not growing, but she didn't
>seem to care that the DAWN figures contradicted her claim,
>ignoring them while she continued to claim that methylphenidate was
>extremely dangerous.Wrong.
It wasn't *my* claim. It was this website.
snip of repost....
See, here is where Jan plays her little games. She posts something and when
called on its contents, she denies that she endorses them.She utters her bilge using the words of others, and then denies it.
Even Scudamore isn't that low. What he posts is bilge, but he stands
behind hit.
I didn't deny anything, except *I* did not make any claims.
Mark needs to take a look at his behavior, not mine.
David can do the same, as this thread isn't about Jan.
Furthermore I have posted other websites with more information. I don't just
automatically take the word of anyone here, many subjects have conflicting
information. Nancy's saying *I didn't care* leaves a lot to be desired.
Jan