rec.bicycles.rides · Public discussion

Re: Comparing bikes [was: Disc Brakes]

Started by NYC XYZ · · Last activity · 3 posts · 419 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.bicycles.rides
Published
23 May 2006
Last activity
23 May 2006
Original author
NYC XYZ
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
419
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Michael Warner said:

    Is there such a thing as recumbent group riding, or do you have to
    be a loner to enjoy it?

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

    There is, but it's rarer than a good inexpensive recumbent.

    Basically, most cyclists seem to be loners in the first place, and
    'bent-riders seem even more solitary by nature. Many build their own;
    such folks seem inherently inclined towards independence.

    I think a society of bicyclists will make for more varied politics than
    this current car culture of ours. Every ride I go to I'm amazed and
    heartened by the great diversity of bikers I meet -- real diversity,
    not au currant diversity that comes in and out of fashion like high
    school cliques. I think there's something about "bike culture" that
    encourages self-sufficiency and, frankly, character and values.

    A motorist is someone who simply has things handed down to him, like an
    enfant terrible of the noveau riche. This can only make for
    homogenization of thought and values. Whoever heard of a biker
    listening to hate radio? But rush-hour talk shows are all the rage for
    frustrated drivers stuck in traffic. All the while, their passive
    minds are fertile ground for advertisers' subliminal messages.

    A bicyclist, by contrast, is a nobler man. It is his own work which
    earns him the wind in his hair. He is also more resourceful, having to
    weave together a route out of the constantly changing road conditions.
    His independence is much encouraged by being able to ride on sidewalks
    and against the traffic, given his status as a half-pedestrian --
    indeed, his good, God-given feet carry him like any pedestrian. The
    bicyclist is the ultimate pedestrian. He is someone with a tool. A
    motorist is someone inside a tool, and consumed by it.

    We bicylists love our machines, but I don't think we are as suspectible
    to the kind of idolatry the way a typical motorist seems to be, since
    the very activity of our sport makes for self-reliance. Such a nation
    would be less lazy and less crazy than the psycho-aggressive pride that
    comes with speed by fiat.

    Hard things make for maturity. What is easy induces infantilism. The
    bicycle is a great combination of man and his machine, making things
    easier but not so easy that the man forgets his humanity, and that he
    is a man, after all.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    NYC XYZ said:

    A bicyclist, by contrast, is a nobler man.

    I understand they are now letting some of the womenfolk use bicycles too.

  3. Dave Rusin said:

    I understand they are now letting some of the womenfolk use bicycles too.

    How do they compare to women drivers?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.