Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Comment on the Equipe accusation

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 352 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 August 2005
Last activity
29 August 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
352
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. One reason for A and B samples is to protect the riders from the
    unintentional sample contamination and intentional tampering. Quality
    assurance practice would require separate handling of the samples,
    storage in separate venues under separate custodians. This
    separation of the samples protects against contaminating, tampering
    with both samples.

    Of course, double sampling from the same bottle provides none of these
    protections. The riders would be exposed.

    Ray

  2. <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    One reason for A and B samples is to protect the riders from the
    unintentional sample contamination and intentional tampering. Quality
    assurance practice would require separate handling of the samples,
    storage in separate venues under separate custodians. This
    separation of the samples protects against contaminating, tampering
    with both samples.

    Of course, double sampling from the same bottle provides none of these
    protections. The riders would be exposed.

    Ray

    Ray,

    Did the A and B comes from the same "big bottle" ?
    or
    Did the rider [censored] twice ?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.